From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983966DE0E83 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:29:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.457 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.457 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.195, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94tvnmPkV0a3 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DBC6DE0C6D for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A85C10008E; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:29:23 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , Luis Ressel , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] test/T030-config: Separate stdout and stderr output In-Reply-To: <87r2bccqij.fsf@tethera.net> References: <20190311171449.28507-1-aranea@aixah.de> <87r2bccqij.fsf@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.28.3+42~g7b16377 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 20:29:31 -0000 On Tue, Mar 12 2019, David Bremner wrote: > Luis Ressel writes: > >> POSIX doesn't specify the flushing behaviour of the STDOUT stream, so >> it's invalid to assume a particular order between the stdout and stderr >> output. The current test breaks on musl due to this. > > Series pushed. Thanks for working through those changes with us. That was fast -- I did not had time to LGTM those (Well, after these years you probably guessed my response alread ;D) Tomi > > d