* build failures on mipsel
@ 2018-06-04 21:52 Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-05 2:44 ` David Bremner
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor @ 2018-06-04 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: debian mipsel buildd maintainers, Notmuch Mail
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2721 bytes --]
hey folks--
the notmuch 0.27 release candidates are failing to build on the debian
mipsel build daemons:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=mipsel&ver=0.27%7Erc0-1&stamp=1527466396&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=mipsel&ver=0.27%7Erc1-1&stamp=1528017305&raw=0
They both fail the test suite here:
T357-index-decryption: Testing indexing decrypted mail
FAIL stash decryption during show
--- T357-index-decryption.9.expected 2018-06-03 09:13:02.472009180 +0000
+++ T357-index-decryption.9.output 2018-06-03 09:13:02.472009180 +0000
@@ -1 +1 @@
-This is a test encrypted message with a wumpus.
+
FAIL search should now find the contents
--- T357-index-decryption.10.expected 2018-06-03 09:13:02.528010019 +0000
+++ T357-index-decryption.10.output 2018-06-03 09:13:02.528010019 +0000
@@ -1 +1 @@
-thread:0000000000000003 2000-01-01 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; test encrypted message for cleartext index 002 (encrypted inbox unread)
+
I've tried to replicate the problem over on eller.debian.org (the mipsel
porterbox) but when i build 0.27~rc1 over there in an schroot, i don't
even get to T357 because the emacs_fcc_message() function hangs in this
loop (is this known to not work in an schroot or under similar
situations?):
+(test/test-lib.sh:988): test_emacs(): sleep 1
+(test/test-lib.sh:987): test_emacs(): test_emacs '()'
+(test/test-lib.sh:960): test_emacs(): missing_dependencies=
+(test/test-lib.sh:961): test_emacs(): test_require_external_prereq dtach
+(test/test-lib.sh:674): test_require_external_prereq(): binary=dtach
+(test/test-lib.sh:675): test_require_external_prereq(): [[ '' == t ]]
+(test/test-lib.sh:679): test_require_external_prereq(): true
+(test/test-lib.sh:962): test_emacs(): test_require_external_prereq emacs
+(test/test-lib.sh:674): test_require_external_prereq(): binary=emacs
+(test/test-lib.sh:675): test_require_external_prereq(): [[ '' == t ]]
+(test/test-lib.sh:679): test_require_external_prereq(): true
+(test/test-lib.sh:963): test_emacs(): test_require_external_prereq emacsclient
+(test/test-lib.sh:674): test_require_external_prereq(): binary=emacsclient
+(test/test-lib.sh:675): test_require_external_prereq(): [[ '' == t ]]
+(test/test-lib.sh:679): test_require_external_prereq(): true
+(test/test-lib.sh:964): test_emacs(): test -z ''
+(test/test-lib.sh:966): test_emacs(): '[' -z notmuch-test-suite-1593 ']'
+(test/test-lib.sh:997): test_emacs(): rm -f OUTPUT
+(test/test-lib.sh:998): test_emacs(): touch OUTPUT
+(test/test-lib.sh:1000): test_emacs(): emacsclient --socket-name=notmuch-test-suite-1593 --eval '(notmuch-test-progn ())'
can anyone suggest a good next debugging step?
--dkg
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: build failures on mipsel
2018-06-04 21:52 build failures on mipsel Daniel Kahn Gillmor
@ 2018-06-05 2:44 ` David Bremner
2018-06-06 14:15 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-05 18:12 ` Tomi Ollila
2018-06-06 14:30 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Bremner @ 2018-06-05 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor, debian mipsel buildd maintainers,
Notmuch Mail
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
>
>
> I've tried to replicate the problem over on eller.debian.org (the mipsel
> porterbox) but when i build 0.27~rc1 over there in an schroot, i don't
> even get to T357 because the emacs_fcc_message() function hangs in this
> loop (is this known to not work in an schroot or under similar
> situations?):
Try:
$ make test-binaries && ./T357-index-decryption.sh
That works for me on eller, so there must be some difference between the
two environments (buildd versus porterbox)
d
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: build failures on mipsel
2018-06-04 21:52 build failures on mipsel Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-05 2:44 ` David Bremner
@ 2018-06-05 18:12 ` Tomi Ollila
2018-06-06 14:30 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Ollila @ 2018-06-05 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor, debian mipsel buildd maintainers,
Notmuch Mail
On Mon, Jun 04 2018, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> hey folks--
>
> the notmuch 0.27 release candidates are failing to build on the debian
> mipsel build daemons:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=mipsel&ver=0.27%7Erc0-1&stamp=1527466396&raw=0
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=mipsel&ver=0.27%7Erc1-1&stamp=1528017305&raw=0
>
> They both fail the test suite here:
>
>
> T357-index-decryption: Testing indexing decrypted mail
> FAIL stash decryption during show
> --- T357-index-decryption.9.expected 2018-06-03 09:13:02.472009180 +0000
> +++ T357-index-decryption.9.output 2018-06-03 09:13:02.472009180 +0000
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -This is a test encrypted message with a wumpus.
> +
> FAIL search should now find the contents
> --- T357-index-decryption.10.expected 2018-06-03 09:13:02.528010019 +0000
> +++ T357-index-decryption.10.output 2018-06-03 09:13:02.528010019 +0000
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -thread:0000000000000003 2000-01-01 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; test encrypted message for cleartext index 002 (encrypted inbox unread)
> +
>
>
> I've tried to replicate the problem over on eller.debian.org (the mipsel
> porterbox) but when i build 0.27~rc1 over there in an schroot, i don't
> even get to T357 because the emacs_fcc_message() function hangs in this
> loop (is this known to not work in an schroot or under similar
> situations?):
>
> +(test/test-lib.sh:988): test_emacs(): sleep 1
> +(test/test-lib.sh:987): test_emacs(): test_emacs '()'
> +(test/test-lib.sh:960): test_emacs(): missing_dependencies=
> +(test/test-lib.sh:961): test_emacs(): test_require_external_prereq dtach
> +(test/test-lib.sh:674): test_require_external_prereq(): binary=dtach
> +(test/test-lib.sh:675): test_require_external_prereq(): [[ '' == t ]]
> +(test/test-lib.sh:679): test_require_external_prereq(): true
> +(test/test-lib.sh:962): test_emacs(): test_require_external_prereq emacs
> +(test/test-lib.sh:674): test_require_external_prereq(): binary=emacs
> +(test/test-lib.sh:675): test_require_external_prereq(): [[ '' == t ]]
> +(test/test-lib.sh:679): test_require_external_prereq(): true
> +(test/test-lib.sh:963): test_emacs(): test_require_external_prereq emacsclient
> +(test/test-lib.sh:674): test_require_external_prereq(): binary=emacsclient
> +(test/test-lib.sh:675): test_require_external_prereq(): [[ '' == t ]]
> +(test/test-lib.sh:679): test_require_external_prereq(): true
> +(test/test-lib.sh:964): test_emacs(): test -z ''
> +(test/test-lib.sh:966): test_emacs(): '[' -z notmuch-test-suite-1593 ']'
> +(test/test-lib.sh:997): test_emacs(): rm -f OUTPUT
> +(test/test-lib.sh:998): test_emacs(): touch OUTPUT
> +(test/test-lib.sh:1000): test_emacs(): emacsclient --socket-name=notmuch-test-suite-1593 --eval '(notmuch-test-progn ())'
>
> can anyone suggest a good next debugging step?
emacs did not start for some reason.
You could try changing the line
sh -c "stty rows 24 cols 80; exec '$TMP_DIRECTORY/run_emacs' \
to
script -c "stty rows 24 cols 80; exec '$TMP_DIRECTORY/run_emacs' \
in test-lib.sh and then see what you get in 'typescriptä file
>
> --dkg
Tomi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: build failures on mipsel
2018-06-05 2:44 ` David Bremner
@ 2018-06-06 14:15 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-06 14:59 ` David Bremner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor @ 2018-06-06 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Bremner, debian mipsel buildd maintainers, Notmuch Mail
On Mon 2018-06-04 23:44:25 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> $ make test-binaries && ./T357-index-decryption.sh
>
> That works for me on eller, so there must be some difference between the
> two environments (buildd versus porterbox)
what schroot are you working from on eller? i wonder what the
difference is between your schroot and mine, because mine fails with the
same emacs problem that tomi identified.
--dkg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: build failures on mipsel
2018-06-04 21:52 build failures on mipsel Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-05 2:44 ` David Bremner
2018-06-05 18:12 ` Tomi Ollila
@ 2018-06-06 14:30 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-06 14:47 ` Tomi Ollila
2018-06-06 17:05 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor @ 2018-06-06 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: debian mipsel buildd maintainers, Notmuch Mail
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]
On Mon 2018-06-04 17:52:46 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I've tried to replicate the problem over on eller.debian.org (the mipsel
> porterbox) but when i build 0.27~rc1 over there in an schroot, i don't
> even get to T357 because the emacs_fcc_message() function hangs in this
> loop (is this known to not work in an schroot or under similar
> situations?):
This problem appears to be related to some bad interaction with
screen(1) inside a sid chroot on eller. i note that bash also has
problems with command line editing in that environment as well.
I'm now running inside of tmux instead, and that problem doesn't happen
any more.
Furthermore, i can't replicate the failure from the buildd when building
on eller either. So neither bremner nor i were able to replicate the
problem.
mipsel porters, do you have any suggestions for next-step debugging?
--dkg
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: build failures on mipsel
2018-06-06 14:30 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
@ 2018-06-06 14:47 ` Tomi Ollila
2018-06-06 17:05 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Ollila @ 2018-06-06 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor, debian mipsel buildd maintainers,
Notmuch Mail
On Wed, Jun 06 2018, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Mon 2018-06-04 17:52:46 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I've tried to replicate the problem over on eller.debian.org (the mipsel
>> porterbox) but when i build 0.27~rc1 over there in an schroot, i don't
>> even get to T357 because the emacs_fcc_message() function hangs in this
>> loop (is this known to not work in an schroot or under similar
>> situations?):
>
> This problem appears to be related to some bad interaction with
> screen(1) inside a sid chroot on eller. i note that bash also has
> problems with command line editing in that environment as well.
>
> I'm now running inside of tmux instead, and that problem doesn't happen
> any more.
>
> Furthermore, i can't replicate the failure from the buildd when building
> on eller either. So neither bremner nor i were able to replicate the
> problem.
>
> mipsel porters, do you have any suggestions for next-step debugging?
This is the line to start emacs
# start a detached session with an emacs server
# user's TERM (or 'vt100' in case user's TERM is known dumb
# or unknown) is given to dtach which assumes a minimally
# VT100-compatible terminal -- and emacs inherits that
TERM=$SMART_TERM dtach -n "$TEST_TMPDIR/emacs-dtach-socket.$$" \
sh -c "stty rows 24 cols 80; exec '$TMP_DIRECTORY/run_emacs' \
--no-window-system \
$load_emacs_tests \
--eval '(setq server-name \"$server_name\")' \
--eval '(server-start)' \
--eval '(orphan-watchdog $$)'" || return
my first guess: SMART_TERM is 'screen', and terminfo for that is missing
if not, then some TTY problem, which may break dtach, and if not dtach,
then emacs
my usual try is strace(1):
TERM=$SMART_TERM strace -f dtach -n "$TEST_TMPDIR/emacs-dtach-socket.$$" \
sh -c "stty rows 24 cols 80; exec '$TMP_DIRECTORY/run_emacs' \
--no-window-system \
$load_emacs_tests \
--eval '(setq server-name \"$server_name\")' \
--eval '(server-start)' \
--eval '(orphan-watchdog $$)'" &
(have to be run in background as strace -f will not exit until every child
program have exited...)
and then comb through strace output (-o option to strace may be useful...).
>
> --dkg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: build failures on mipsel
2018-06-06 14:15 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
@ 2018-06-06 14:59 ` David Bremner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Bremner @ 2018-06-06 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor, debian mipsel buildd maintainers,
Notmuch Mail
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
> On Mon 2018-06-04 23:44:25 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> $ make test-binaries && ./T357-index-decryption.sh
>>
>> That works for me on eller, so there must be some difference between the
>> two environments (buildd versus porterbox)
>
> what schroot are you working from on eller? i wonder what the
> difference is between your schroot and mine, because mine fails with the
> same emacs problem that tomi identified.
>
> --dkg
I'm using schroot session bremner-notmuch, which iirc I based on sid and
running ./T357-index-decryption.sh directly (in tmux or out doesn't seem
to matter).
d
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: build failures on mipsel
2018-06-06 14:30 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-06 14:47 ` Tomi Ollila
@ 2018-06-06 17:05 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-07 13:58 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor @ 2018-06-06 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: debian mipsel buildd maintainers, Notmuch Mail
On Wed 2018-06-06 10:30:15 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Furthermore, i can't replicate the failure from the buildd when building
> on eller either. So neither bremner nor i were able to replicate the
> problem.
>
> mipsel porters, do you have any suggestions for next-step debugging?
I notice that the two failures for notmuch
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=mipsel&ver=0.27%7Erc0-1&stamp=1527466396&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=mipsel&ver=0.27%7Erc1-1&stamp=1528017305&raw=0
are both built on the buildd mipsel-manda-03.debian.org.
perhaps there's something wrong with that buildd? maybe a giveback
would let another build daemon take a crack at the package.
mipsel folks, could you give back the experimental version of notmuch to
the mipsel buildd network and try to avoid having it land on
mipsel-manda-03?
thanks,
--dkg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: build failures on mipsel
2018-06-06 17:05 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
@ 2018-06-07 13:58 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor @ 2018-06-07 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: debian mipsel buildd maintainers, Notmuch Mail
On Wed 2018-06-06 13:05:15 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> mipsel folks, could you give back the experimental version of notmuch to
> the mipsel buildd network and try to avoid having it land on
> mipsel-manda-03?
Thank you for the giveback! However, it looks like it landed on
mipsel-manda-03 again (and had the same error). could you try giving it
back one more time? is there a way to force it to another host?
or do you have another recommendation for debugging?
--dkg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-07 13:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-04 21:52 build failures on mipsel Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-05 2:44 ` David Bremner
2018-06-06 14:15 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-06 14:59 ` David Bremner
2018-06-05 18:12 ` Tomi Ollila
2018-06-06 14:30 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-06 14:47 ` Tomi Ollila
2018-06-06 17:05 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-06-07 13:58 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).