From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888386DE0231 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:36:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.056 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQdDZNUw4DiH for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:36:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAE96DE021E for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:36:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id g62so28615601wme.0 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:36:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=Ie2gHwnT8zm9Yc2tnkm5DvOg3xwNJMLkPA9/EYH/gfM=; b=YhUYJ9Sm2q+rmP5z7ZlVyhodQXxPCrk/XsyhOcjxEQU+6cC1PLms6XeBnMiQoktUDo Ejir05PB8IAZBx4E0HnRqqpNFzjO7Mi6ccpghYIzSOS6Zbakh9S7tV+BNE0Ksz/IgCmI wEFQpedbLEInwr2Wk4FlK1XX7oRDse3g9p/xa0/+iF8DQCvMxnDp5R+2MB68Pv60R03q buUh0P6xy302bItIGAkrdA0AUGBhjs7og5T5/h/VS8LuSvQZtVl9hkmd7DjdFCBLjgUl D5GTKcMta8wyvkF3Wry0Q6PosqSfKlLAS1c4UvZjWItqgs/RrLGklfiNAog/cSIFcAnp TE5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=Ie2gHwnT8zm9Yc2tnkm5DvOg3xwNJMLkPA9/EYH/gfM=; b=dNZsrzdV4FkxeEee90/29DhjCK2G2YD1NHG4eNJ2v+8j2eP2lfolHNK31L1mRTplpc 424lh2+/OiZYeigLS7ImqQtSL6EoC6n/Jtbio9P2NrKwdYfoGqX2TlxjqQ7MsD+Ig8rD bn8HBdt/uYnDWlO55HtCdN/4CjbBwCtCavtEDAPa4DN6V2Af0zCVrz0LA8aat+5+CvZu q6DFdWqWc68ws27dLacSovrBIPoEj6/2hM85Pf/yereMD6XuEZh5+FXSuN9mp+AIVG00 ZzhmfaBy5/9kZ9KFn6MGh+/U5TP9d33rFzGoG+w1yNffaiUuBjxVWWM8+b+JzdlxwlQi +chA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT/N9aLtofwHZusyKfC5fINAcz04Y28BzXQwiggkZkHEv0CsK6pSbW4RhWwBlB7jQ== X-Received: by 10.28.97.135 with SMTP id v129mr5692813wmb.90.1455032186545; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:36:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m67sm18003955wma.10.2016.02.09.07.36.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local]) by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 01530576; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:36:23 +0000 (UTC) To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , David Bremner , Gaudenz Steinlin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org, 810784@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [Gaudenz Steinlin] Bug#810784: should match email adress case insensitive when sending encrypted mail In-Reply-To: References: <87egdm4ujh.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> <874mee7k88.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> From: David Edmondson Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:36:23 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:36:31 -0000 On Mon, Feb 08 2016, David Edmondson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08 2016, David Edmondson wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15 2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> So where is the case-insensitive lookup happening? Is this a bug in >>> mml-mode, or in notmuch-emacs? >> >> It's caused by behaviour in mml2015.el (hence upstream). >> >> `mml2015-epg-check-user-id' uses `equal' to compare the recipient from >> the composition buffer with the addresses from the matching key. >> >> The simplest way to get the desired behaviour would be to `downcase' >> both strings before comparing. > > Reported as bug#22603 in emacs. Fixed in the emacs-25 branch.