On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:24:11 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:00:21 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> > Understood. For me this fell inside the 'trivial other change' boundary.
> 
> Fwiw, I don't remember there ever being such a distinction.  I think
> we've always insisted that unrelated changes should be excluded.

I didn't mean to claim that the project had such a rule, just that I did.