On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:45 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, "David Bremner" <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> > 
> > Sometimes someone (Dmitry?) sent patches that separated a small functional
> > change, and the big non-functional indentation change it caused,
> > separately. Would you prefer (or tolerate ;) that style?
> 
> Hmm, that might be nicer, I'm not 100% sure.
> 
> I wouldn't say it's mandatory for a patch like this (and I'd say other
> peoples views on what's easy to review are at least as important as mine
> here).

Each patch should be valid in the repository without any following
patches (preceding are obviously okay). Incorrect indentation would
disqualify a patch from being 'valid', so it shouldn't be accepted.