From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25097431FC7 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:41:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OipnLRwDWPYn for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:41:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06CD2431FBC for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:41:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r20so23453864wiv.12 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:41:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=yBRC1PjyX4PtRlWklH+FBHSRL5RQ3wc9JRC6flBLdPs=; b=FwGYHUg2sau/GxAe/h1UBSdZQP6wCw0QQhIscFvgaV4lcnZjGQWkOXlcOIG08Sg8pI IF3RWNIObsnEXUMmOpPcEIiRxjizgl2DyhuvvJTAaN5l18Q9ivGURgAJvC9Qsv7onPg1 uYwfrbWAT+VDUKzU8t6VVIKTTgB+YH/6mQHm8qmFGUwnO1Wh2oj55FA1qOUbsQZOZuJR HY6fM0sGflVk4VBwNOdBu5D71hzTxwJY7XYdp4EmMkihmKKLmeyJK1CzUzU1F/blML35 9gf6KpAqsFqfLkz9xguNVCg7uXrmBL51w5qlOiXY/nVWUWT4zKt9uAJUQ/l6aFG4UuLw gXZg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvHk+qmbyzcMLPxH9Joc/F569yJUo7bnZEieb0WZwcAJpiKxfmzHL7jJdOoxakm1tBPOGl X-Received: by 10.194.234.40 with SMTP id ub8mr93502423wjc.100.1417416085851; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm27080954wiz.12.2014.11.30.22.41.24 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (30000@localhost [local]); by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id ffd2a11a; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 06:41:23 +0000 (UTC) To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org, 759646@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [Vagrant Cascadian] Bug#759646: notmuch-emacs: switching mode= to invalid value sends unencrypted mail In-Reply-To: <87egsldds6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <87lhq7npcw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87k35q2zso.fsf@nikula.org> <54055C53.40604@fifthhorseman.net> <87egsldds6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:41:23 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:41:36 -0000 On Sat, Nov 29 2014, David Bremner wrote: > David Edmondson writes: > >> On Tue, Sep 02 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 02 2014, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/30/2014 03:37 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>>>> I'm inclined to think this is a bug in message-mode. >>>> >>>> I agree it's a bug in message-mode, not in notmuch itself. >>> >>> I think it might be here: >>> >>> http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/emacs/emacs-24/annotate/head:/lisp/gnus/mml.el#L258 >>> >>> (it takes time to load, please wait...) >>> >>> If cond does not match, then don't fail... >> >> This looks to have been fixed in emacs at the end of September 2014. > > Right, this fix was released in emacs 24.4 > > I'm a little torn what to do here. On the one hand the upstream change > fixes the bug as reported. On the other hand, if something corrupts the > #secure tag (e.g., by deleting a letter), then the message is still sent > un-uncrypted. I'm unclear on what you mean. Is it that "upgrade to 24.4" is not a good enough answer, because we are still leaving pre-24.4 people out in the cold?