From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C500C431FD2 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:20:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jo1JIU6hWjAr for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:20:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 201F5431FBC for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:20:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by wgbdt12 with SMTP id dt12so4618073wgb.2 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:20:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.109.77 with SMTP id hq13mr10031115wib.7.1327486832942; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:20:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cb8sm19049663wib.0.2012.01.25.02.20.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:20:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000) id 902F89FCDA; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:20:30 +0000 (GMT) To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Emacs: Crypto: How to get automatic encryption? In-Reply-To: <87liow6slg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87pqejj5nl.fsf@marcos.anarcat.ath.cx> <87ehuo7pjr.fsf@algae.riseup.net> <87ehuoljzs.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87liow6slg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+109~g03934e4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:20:26 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlF6JP+iSpHbys0tGBixloohx444mQiNP1wR12Spn0/mv40Px7eYIJ8XTjr3HKuG5gB5AJP X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:20:35 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:19 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:23:01 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > > Can you explain the logic that will apply to determine whether or not a > > reply is encrypted? >=20 > My plan was to modify notmuch-reply.c to include a flag in the JSON > output if the message being replied to was encrypted. The emacs reply > function could then look for that flag and add the ml-secure directive > to encrypt the reply. Isn't it still necessary to ensure that you have encryption keys appropriate to the recipient? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8f12oACgkQaezQq/BJZRaT4QCfQPzDMg01QWJllnXNEDNh4j8u vakAn0JbCjCjr+awPvYnkeNACWVhwX2K =VFtz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--