From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E29A429E33 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:54:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TgOacMewzmIp for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7B4429E32 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by wibhq2 with SMTP id hq2so1086261wib.26 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:54:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.8.229 with SMTP id u5mr9887092wia.9.1325840092109; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:54:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n3sm22564161wiz.9.2012.01.06.00.54.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000) id 25010A1734; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:54:49 +0000 (GMT) To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org, david@tethera.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+151~gbf1dc2b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:54:45 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:54:54 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:25:11 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the default > in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)? No strong opinion (I hardly ever use the CLI directly). > Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by > default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)? I'd be happy with that. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8GttUACgkQaezQq/BJZRbjbgCeKgANDg0oAq970P2Jpvf5WP3I +MwAnjFxvmtd6IqEciAWhuoQ3aZzP2X9 =AFJA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--