From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id Jpa5LH4AHWDoIQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:23:26 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id IMk0KH4AHWAhIQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:23:26 +0000 Received: from mail.notmuchmail.org (nmbug.tethera.net [IPv6:2607:5300:201:3100::1657]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA4619402AB for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nmbug.tethera.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E051FBA9; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 03:23:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807201FAEC for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 03:23:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id j11so5243334wmi.3 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:23:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=ndxF6F6Hq4BtfJ9QxH73D9nVc11Wq6SZw2/Hmm1amKA=; b=heyJ12gMsYpaasSzMUCV611mVMa+rVKS8bYWIF/BvWe31NQe9ujeNltpyPDXQJeJtY lWlDbTEhBWDTkJVkfSEbogaxhquDEA8tEXsY/b1+y1AoASJtk1x4kNDXN+USpiSO6OBX 7QegBmEEcZy9VR/sWdeVoEfMjyJnJ8NvqVTBxIWLFv5dkTx+GGDxIQ4Kb4W43rU9yv3t IzknawErob8FxacEDsEqFU8dYt4xjkdyEci2igpmI7tNPF/TXJQRuWObb09thrpVROpv H5HXDZs2g1XGuCkY4vQ7Lb0Dz+ViKPZuQQsi5ZlleRYEnurSwZOnhuLDrrmlyCY6lANq NjlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=ndxF6F6Hq4BtfJ9QxH73D9nVc11Wq6SZw2/Hmm1amKA=; b=SseFlD7WLsEfWVB0meVuCndoR+kmOke7qWAvJW0CkOFTOKOUv+daORnPlwrqFjCbbj n/3B9pkJKVLkxK3jSF7bOeWjQ+EwCsmBkzdqNyUNDJwGxr9N8Py0K+SIPo48+1UeHGWH OPubVKrNmrseTlVvZKTYYLOvvXFtQabRj9yTtv5wWN9GZ4GCDSWoNSpXHunD770dR/bi gKmP3i48/ffAYSya+SNbmWMea5huZJh9diBRH3TN5UDYESgpyP5WxtTYeqhpcOW1SskJ Lod/vCsEhh4kszcYkdVoGjyM/i9tvtAZYoe4nHXedTsT0zUrLt0F9RZbR9YBRI8aC6YM yhSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531e4JYNeUJWgEoqW9/+Vf8b23LoPzHFZDThON77UFARVMcZs3H6 ux4SWZ2YPYIRcTPrxNmEAIAxBBprJ3YBb453 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsGJgt2EIT4ldYQC056s15WTq1+0FiqVbPrK5pwZBmtgJxwzVezZbrla9b31vi5LP3+gdeag== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:8157:: with SMTP id c84mr2573924wmd.24.1612513390462; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:23:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net. [2001:8b0:bb71:7140:64::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y18sm11339369wrt.19.2021.02.05.00.23.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:23:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local]) by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id ab82cc8c; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:23:09 +0000 (UTC) To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] show: Add support for -format=raw -body=false In-Reply-To: <87blczw8f1.fsf@tethera.net> References: <20210117183710.29850-1-dme@dme.org> <87mtx6gn97.fsf@tethera.net> <87eeiigkwd.fsf@tethera.net> <87blczw8f1.fsf@tethera.net> X-HGTTG: zarquon From: David Edmondson Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:23:09 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: 4VC55TGG5YYECBDKAAOXTHT7P7AJNF3W X-Message-ID-Hash: 4VC55TGG5YYECBDKAAOXTHT7P7AJNF3W X-MailFrom: dme@dme.org X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-notmuch.notmuchmail.org-0 X-Mailman-Version: 3.2.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.82 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("body hash did not verify") header.d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=heyJ12gM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 2607:5300:201:3100::1657 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CA4619402AB X-Spam-Score: -0.82 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: gzZ9LBMdy63f On Thursday, 2021-02-04 at 22:33:06 -04, David Bremner wrote: > David Edmondson writes: > >>> I'm just nervous about more legacy formats. I think we will get the >>> arbitrary headers thing working eventually, but I can see it might take >>> some time. >> >> Are we ever likely to get rid of the raw format? I use it quite a bit, >> and it seems to be relatively low complexity and simple to support. > > It isn't completely without maintenance overhead, but I agree it's not > going away. I can live with the body=false option if you think it's > better / more feasible than the arbitrary headers series. At the moment I'm using the former because the latter is missing, but in principle I think that they might fill different needs. Could we have both? dme. -- I just bite it, it's for the look I don't light it.