From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3494C431FD0 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:54:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PJmR72y7I-x for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:54:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8241A431FB6 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:54:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by eeke51 with SMTP id e51so593109eek.26 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:54:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.123.10 with SMTP id u10mr8251041eeh.71.1326225249037; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:54:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe5cdc00-23.dhcp.inet.fi. [80.220.92.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm57219696eeu.1.2012.01.10.11.54.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:54:07 -0800 (PST) From: Jani Nikula To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] reply to sender Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:54:00 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 In-Reply-To: References: X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:54:12 -0000 Hi all, v3 of the reply-to-sender series. Changes since v2: - Patches 1 and 2 of the original series were pushed already. - Patch 1: Don't force recipient type, based on comment by Mark (id:"877h11eq3g.fsf@qmul.ac.uk"). Fix man page accordinly, and clean up the wording a bit otherwise too. - Patch 4: Fix according to above change, reverting back to Mark's original patch. There have now been comments for and against patch 3 (rebinding 'r' for reply-to-sender and 'R' for reply-to-all). Perhaps there are just too many people that are used to 'r' for reply-to-all by now. I'll just leave it up to David be the referee here. ;) BR, Jani. Jani Nikula (3): cli: add support for replying just to the sender in "notmuch reply" emacs: add support for replying just to the sender emacs: bind 'r' to reply-to-sender and 'R' to reply-to-all Mark Walters (1): test: add tests for "notmuch reply" --reply-to=sender emacs/notmuch-mua.el | 9 ++- emacs/notmuch-show.el | 12 ++- emacs/notmuch.el | 11 ++- man/man1/notmuch-reply.1 | 28 +++++- notmuch-reply.c | 70 ++++++++++++---- test/notmuch-test | 1 + test/reply-to-sender | 209 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) create mode 100755 test/reply-to-sender -- 1.7.5.4