From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DEC6DE0164 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:52:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ogs-vjogqOMU for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D126DE00DF for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b14so2872742wme.0 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:52:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wVJQgyzTdl8znZZpon1lvIG6JNvvOBosAVxwW9t/NP8=; b=SqTnGrmwbk+RxHZr+ba+jcpr0F8iKRaybaINDufnTl84sZfl8mz0IX5bkfO61ik2Zq pax36BT5WwK6K2IUCl7NPKyva85JB38y2ig6FNuNOAffVYf5odc05GyIf9DtoidrO/Gs FZjpmvOYR3Vl/gMQm6leZmLfQxZ7Z/wOW0MY66mhucMioNDzrHWPGajPwkOObuwUl3ra PQ1z5XWxzR6VQsx5+RKekgCCE16WTDBykJZY8Y9ZOnOVZMx0HlRbAFb29HTBPIv2+ASP GJO7wiENUVWgHF3qLJ3i9xebT0hAb5J7MImrImqrwj+yeDgQohVJI6ZOl/ZR5I1yhlFs OqgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5j9bcCvDgB6orctCpK5ho/lTA0bS4rgWVxtaK/pLxilWp2P8yUj qyM7jsYpWCdO1XoDr8Q= X-Received: by 10.28.158.206 with SMTP id h197mr119286wme.95.1503687133663; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.thecybershadow.net (CyberShadow-1-pt.tunnel.tserv1.bud1.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:1f1a:172::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i80sm2704723wmh.40.2017.08.25.11.52.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] notmuch on Windows (Cygwin) and AppVeyor To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: <20170822224339.22601-1-notmuch@thecybershadow.net> <87o9r37udn.fsf@tethera.net> From: Vladimir Panteleev Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:52:11 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87o9r37udn.fsf@tethera.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:52:18 -0000 On 2017-08-25 11:35, David Bremner wrote: > If I understand correctly, then the series as a whole is mainly of > potential interest to developers wishing to take the notmuch-on-cygwin > project farther, rather than to end users. That's correct. It's possible that despite the test suite failures, a sufficiently large subset of notmuch's functionality may be working sufficiently correctly to use notmuch to some extent as it is now, though I haven't actually tried doing so. > Are there bits proposed for > inclusion in notmuch now, or is the primary goal discussion and > archiving of the work? If there is interest, patches 1-7 could be merged for the sole reason to prevent them from going stale, and patch 8 could serve as a base to ensure the partial Cygwin support does not regress from its current state. Otherwise, archiving is fine too. If there's interest I can send a v2 with the nits pointed out in IRC. -- Best regards, Vladimir