From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52728429E42 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:36:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.798 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ubwJ3kUrVob for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:36:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CCAD431FD0 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:36:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by dady9 with SMTP id y9so24085424dad.26 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:36:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PkvEL6Iq/lP19aRlRzHaZfj+LGSjWlDtFvmmWNW98Ek=; b=mVEGzJDE75P4zaVGkKYGz1cE2rAMlGAN5AQywWbd7J1nwlxkBVdWdBHLvCxsD0UP4H V/TH3nJkO8PxeEwT5W6yRmr5zYZQUixcFHPcRSQ3bSOe1+RJqDmlNYh9byzulA1CFkaX Os69fPuPE8x/o0EheN+tXOf7oMzdOLvTi0Jtw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.72.9 with SMTP id z9mr135607402pbu.124.1325630192588; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.162.13 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:36:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d3b08m1a.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <4F037CA3.5020501@gmail.com> <87d3b08m1a.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:36:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16 From: Peter Portante To: Jameson Graef Rollins Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04170191bb97c904b5a75416 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:34 -0000 --f46d04170191bb97c904b5a75416 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is there a good test suite for notmuch? I'll take a crack at it using the latest 0.11 sources and see how far I get. Thanks, -peter On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins < jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante < > peter.a.portante@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been > > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under > > Fedora 16: > > > > [pportant@frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make > > Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines. > > CC -O2 debugger.o > > In file included from debugger.c:21:0: > > notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name > 'GMimeSignatureValidity' > > notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCipherContext' > > make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1 > > > > It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remove > > the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and > > renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext. > > Hey, Peter. Unfortunately notmuch is not yet compatible with gmime 2.6. > gmime 2.5, which is apparently what's in Fedora 16, is the experimental > release of the 2.6 interface. > > Updating notmuch to work with gmime 2.6 has been on the todo list for a > while now, and it's obviously getting more urgent. I've been planning > on looking into it at it as soon as I can, but if anyone else wants to > take a crack at it, I'll be happy to review patches. > > jamie. > --f46d04170191bb97c904b5a75416 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is there a good test suite for notmuch?

I'll take a = crack at it using the latest 0.11 sources and see how far I get.
=
Thanks, -peter

On Tue, Jan= 3, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:= 39 -0500, Peter Portante <= peter.a.portante@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been<= br> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under > Fedora 16:
>
> =A0 =A0 [pportant@frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
> =A0 =A0 Use "make V=3D1" to see the verbose compile lines. > =A0 =A0 CC -O2 debugger.o
> =A0 =A0 In file included from debugger.c:21:0:
> =A0 =A0 notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeSign= atureValidity'
> =A0 =A0 notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCiph= erContext'
> =A0 =A0 make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1
>
> It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remo= ve
> the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and<= br> > renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext.

Hey, Peter. =A0Unfortunately notmuch is not yet compatible with gmime= 2.6.
gmime 2.5, which is apparently what's in Fedora 16, is the experimental=
release of the 2.6 interface.

Updating notmuch to work with gmime 2.6 has been on the todo list for a
while now, and it's obviously getting more urgent. =A0I've been pla= nning
on looking into it at it as soon as I can, but if anyone else wants to
take a crack at it, I'll be happy to review patches.

jamie.

--f46d04170191bb97c904b5a75416--