From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C292431FAF for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6kNsriF9Vysd for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9400B431FAE for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so60842lah.26 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=aoXEABLs8/v5CbCZxTt4kBxbi/PsaBkxt/o7fSzVYJA=; b=QkeXA1DiLyafQoGcHzHBa6vif4vN/94vxCZnZazLxwzxEp+cjwxhC+IS41O5De5K84 ZOwp4YFeYF0UWV0gDPHhhYlY4fbWzfzdEBhBc2yOUNWAv/Be5/Us3PJqQavJ55R8fKua B7KHAZTOBavzGTc29YYfpwxMrde2JOGJ5iovQZ4ii7cgsgiHOuVucTYgN/tm5vOhDPEL 1+S+15vxy+wCpOkNnpzyxlNY/iT0NWGvSQ6aa/6wLszjGAbAs9SReQqEYy+V2CVGFyOJ 1EvdZCTZHtJ9kIUjUbE/iO5dAJs0NjuhVqQO5/tRPw3AT/Y66Tiv6iC8B92BQ60rO64q 5zEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.28.10 with SMTP id x10mr1270589lbg.41.1335357979579; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: awg@xvx.ca Received: by 10.112.23.39 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56] In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:46:19 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LgFcMzo0o4OikPi-J5dMzH9GfOo Message-ID: Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13 From: Adam Wolfe Gordon To: David Bremner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn62s06nGRmCsuooaA+gqld4YFGP/XKF0b9ecVuektDTeCDPYE7C0ZSAmnHid1UMugery9I Cc: notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:46:24 -0000 Hi David, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:31, David Bremner wrote: > I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of > May. =A0What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and > pushed for 0.13? I would like to get the HTML reply series [1] in before 0.13, since otherwise the reply stuff that's already pushed can cause some ugly (but not buggy) behavior, quoting raw HTML in reply. There's been one review, and it's a small patch, but I think it could use another set of eyes. [1] id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca" -- Adam