From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F83431FB6 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:34:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNra0KHVjQV6 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36FC8431FAE for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id v10so2134494lbd.2 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:34:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WDSz41qYk91Vi7BmnLbx1IfBzBayqdQBuvbGMaOBlnE=; b=qVyKOO0YTS7YWs4xL+3X/jI/nraFl+uRFMja0OfRvD/KppPDES+vl3uLHpXVIyaqq+ qeugLoX0OIatC2XFbly1kJsNku2gts1clmXOANB/CL8Bop11/tj5hUpPmAsL53lq0gBW p7KvhZv891SWTAvPhGagsRHsnM/3GZ5wye6ocuFMvlqLovRQ+yji+kteBJSEwFzGSnzQ arvSNHG7J+wjre0WdlP25IMplBYCNqBjQK7xmoWggjzoILjq5KCgY/RpCPlXXXdG/qRJ aXIN6xtgrOK0p1Yg47B5tvVOrh9KOgrN/kCNLSO0mB0ul5zyPFj1WL7KTkRt0oDihw9W xgLA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.143.10 with SMTP id sa10mr2094071lbb.36.1365032088695; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.20.36 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:34:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130403214846.11127.89080@brick.lan> References: <871udhcmks.fsf@zancas.localnet> <515b37a1821fc_146e1045e1094149@nysa.mail> <20130403060158.GJ7702@vilya.m0g.net> <515bf1d3cdb5b_79f845e181791@nysa.mail> <20130403214846.11127.89080@brick.lan> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:34:48 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: the future of notmuch-vim? From: Felipe Contreras To: Patrick Totzke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:34:50 -0000 On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Patrick Totzke wrote: > Quoting Felipe Contreras (2013-04-03 10:09:39) >> ... >> What you prefer is irrelevant; it's relevant only for you, that's why it's >> called a *preference*, the rest of us prefer different things. > > Never mind preferences, I think originally, this thread was about dropping > *support* for the *original* vim plugin that lives in notmuch/contrib. > I think we can all agree that this is reasonable. The reasons for dropping the original vim script are exactly the same reasons why it should be replaced with the ruby version. > This should not keep you from hacking on your script, hosting > it whereever you like and support it. > For me, one of the charms of notmuch is exactly this extensibility. Bpth are "my" scripts. I'm supposed to be the maintainer of the vim script and I have commit access. -- Felipe Contreras