From: Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com>
To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: use font-face instead of explicit colouring
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:09:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALR_T9CPMKq+9pC9HnKpOiOVnK8DrC33qVF1B8QSctYnSJQ63w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9glb367.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2122 bytes --]
That's a shame. Having light/dark alternatives are OK as a workaround but
it's a shame this can't just all be done with faces. I don't see why there
needs to be a string to face lookup map, why not just put the string in the
face name?
On 5 Mar 2016 11:00 a.m., "Mark Walters" <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016, Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I should say that I am aware of the workaround, e.g.
> >
> > (setq
> > notmuch-search-line-faces '(("unread" :weight bold)
> > ("flagged" :inherit
> 'font-lock-string-face)))
> >
> > but this must be applied per-user. If you removed this defcustom and had
> > unread/flagged/other faces, then themes (such as darcula) would be able
> > to provide sensible defaults out of the box.
>
> I am not sure I see how this would work without cluttering up the
> customize options significantly. The notmuch-search-line-faces allows
> selecting the face based on any tag (so for example I use different
> colours for emails tagged "work", and tagged "waiting"). We could have
> additional notmuch-search-line-unread-face which could then be used in
> the above -- but now the user has two places to customize the same thing.
>
> How do you see this working?
>
> (We probably could make the default depend on light or dark theme to make
> the default more usable.)
>
> Best wishes
>
> Mark
>
> >
> > Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> [ text/plain ]
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I use a dark theme and many of the colour choices of notmuch collide
> >> with my theme. However, notmuch is explicitly adding information such as
> >> "blue foreground" instead of using faces that I can customise.
> >>
> >> Could you please consider using faces instead of explicit colours?
> >>
> >> [ text/plain ]
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Sam
> >> [ signature.asc: application/pgp-signature ]
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Sam
> > _______________________________________________
> > notmuch mailing list
> > notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> > https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3035 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-05 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-05 9:54 use font-face instead of explicit colouring Sam Halliday
2016-03-05 10:03 ` Sam Halliday
2016-03-05 11:00 ` Mark Walters
2016-03-05 11:09 ` Sam Halliday [this message]
2016-03-05 11:26 ` Mark Walters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALR_T9CPMKq+9pC9HnKpOiOVnK8DrC33qVF1B8QSctYnSJQ63w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sam.halliday@gmail.com \
--cc=markwalters1009@gmail.com \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).