From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E4A6DE0223 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:54:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.719 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1Azh1WmIhCb for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:54:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from avasout05.plus.net (avasout05.plus.net [84.93.230.250]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A886DE021C for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:54:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.bubblegen.co.uk ([80.229.236.194]) by smtp with ESMTP id hLsGel2He4R9zhLsIeEb05; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 20:54:26 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=f4Fm+t6M c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=G4bc5lkgapKKm1P+Twxy3Q==:117 a=G4bc5lkgapKKm1P+Twxy3Q==:17 a=Op4juWPpsa0A:10 a=skbIlk6SAAAA:8 a=5AaKC-WXB0naVhSiwBgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=4RYuJFsMM3alZua0qAwA:9 a=OOSiFXSA_nq6IOnB:21 a=P5SZwATmzn4K3VfFWgKo:22 Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: matt) by mail.bubblegen.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1C484622018 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 20:54:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id o89so28265709lfg.10 for ; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 12:54:23 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcJvyG6n1CqQVFQU+dSjCg4jRJl4lAu+zEINpJ/mZo9OlrTpxM7 U8HT3NiFbcWfl0uCKMJ/Ihi8YO5ZeeNdXp0UP1Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225R9+uV3ezHOsjkRw8ArIVGqzqk+ddk2XNQPu28OcOYLFCEm6bqGY7jLL6QMlxqs1XXoZVvmeecIWN+jZHDrJ0= X-Received: by 10.46.16.210 with SMTP id 79mr478317ljq.119.1517518462100; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 12:54:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.223.85 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:54:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bmhaafv2.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> References: <874ln4zm7x.fsf@nikula.org> <87bmhaafv2.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> From: Matthew Lear Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 20:54:21 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: trouble searching with unix timestamps To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Cc: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1c049edfad4205642ccc8c" X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEfupLuc1YjdXfvl5XieXfCYHLWyUTgkUQx7cpCbpOngF2821zVKhotTP6EZAfuCwqZB1nIgrzpyCWY+14yvk97Tl8eITwrxRotsOL+AKjTSwjUYTfc2 Izi2MctSOQh/3BIm57EKD52w366O5VBSnDcHkVG3vTrWAxHiZh1cz78gAI+d//d3oete/wX2IRYQnw== X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 20:54:30 -0000 --94eb2c1c049edfad4205642ccc8c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sure thing. Just done it now. On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Mon 2018-01-29 16:13:38 +0000, Matthew Lear wrote: > > [ Jani wrote: ] > >> Alternatively, you can use @ in date: queries, although this > >> seems to be completely undocumented: > > > > I guess this relates to similar syntax requirements of date -d in that a > > unix timestamp is required to be preceded by an @ > > agreed, it seems in line with that. > > Matthew, since you've been reading the docs there most recently, maybe > you'd be up for sending a patch to make sure this feature is findable in > the documentation? > > --dkg > --94eb2c1c049edfad4205642ccc8c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sure thing. Just done it now.

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Daniel = Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
On Mon 2018-01-29 16:13:38 +0000, Matthew Lear wrote:=
> [ Jani wrote: ]
>> Alternatively, you can use @<timestamp> in = date: queries, although this
>> seems to be completely undocumented:
>
> I guess this relates to similar syntax requirements of date -d in that= a
> unix timestamp is required to be preceded by an @

agreed, it seems in line with that.

Matthew, since you've been reading the docs there most recently, maybe<= br> you'd be up for sending a patch to make sure this feature is findable i= n
the documentation?

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 --dkg

--94eb2c1c049edfad4205642ccc8c--