From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8A1431FD4 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:59:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.738 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBwsf8uWVwVC for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0E3431FD2 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by weop45 with SMTP id p45so146893516weo.0 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:59:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DlMwCWiQx5UYfceoW8ELMko1A8584PGv7Nv9xmKkdz8=; b=f4iw4u2WdUAD9KMRbg8MOahbX2w+FUgkFBYicMh/w0JbvAIgWZwf9yxJIVqd4tSl21 VULhylZjIBU/mpC1NtZ5cXKTaQgICCnNV8qh87maWnwjaGD9tdlE+X5dKczKRF6P9AYb uNyJpBHDOtp1eRTA+rOBj34xzfWM+Nj2oqWcfS6BnPsIDWBnkdI07Gnbm/AkBlePnElk md9TmH6WdXUIX0Gm8fk0LotXQUGVopufb2b87mFQdF+9nlu6MIo39KUpodNPPHei7kAT 1vojH0v7qscVnJkrVe4XZl460Vd1DalWrcI6aj+TGd3eX1vhDn8qBIcKGg4/IQtAYjpD A53Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQncgG1/rpA/7/II/GqmsFAsCZVOQ7cH19oOX6F4tb9KxIoLSLXDTGvMNXDriOZyuIYBBXgw MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.101 with SMTP id q5mr15699873wix.83.1427140757433; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.104.195 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:59:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sicv60xn.fsf@jedbrown.org> References: <87sicv60xn.fsf@jedbrown.org> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:59:17 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Emacs client scalability for long, deeply-nested threads From: Michael Hudson-Doyle To: Jed Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:59:23 -0000 I have encountered this too. A C-u before entering the thread helps (this means already read messages are not rendered I think), as does a M-x notmuch-show-toggle-thread-indentation . Something less manual would be nice, I guess... On 24 March 2015 at 07:09, Jed Brown wrote: > I occasionally end up with threads containing several hundred messages > and deep nesting. Eventually, displaying them exceeds the default > max-specpdl-size and later max-lisp-eval-depth. These variables can be > increased, but the time required to display the thread stretches to > minutes. Does anyone have suggestions for improving performance in such > scenarios? > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch >