From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0126DE1D5F for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:55:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.315 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.315 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.504, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mqRDHq-Ybpqd for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com (mail-it0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9656DE1D32 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 203so109713157ith.0 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:55:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=n4VHvG6XrAk2ZGbW1Ch0NHGaxbE3/iauszhM11DtZxg=; b=MB4cmLzXQ5snlrV+lB+6jqOs0pxLGAxXdOgAC40yvsN0f21ltaDIb2fHH1cWu6HJ3C n4fGgtGvvo+r7sfgC9+hksyk/WB0Wzqum/Hk1Qs7td/DXErszcw5BQttEqIxHV+XzMKf EeDoA/FQzfwJnrdnsBAwcUaoOeRCjRy/xz/BfqdtS/Sqo4+B1yHXoF47v60jdRN1veSS D01xsAAdsZRC4leJfNgETMWJ1PJ+xmpBV8OLcZvXeiMQHw2c06NEyUVelkUauYQh/RBa XMYwOnkMhyySubCdvn5n3GhC13R4pD1P58+s8yhJsM2hNRAK+kHcmCexk7O4EqKC5ufX CsXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=n4VHvG6XrAk2ZGbW1Ch0NHGaxbE3/iauszhM11DtZxg=; b=MRrgAPAFYiDMUsnEfdDn+WlbTGmxlWXUlj7OLMGtWi5ah2hcDI2LrDl/yuCkReUm5G zlMWOfQPcNsJ5LGm2noSLKO4JTA93o0PzKICdrUfp9gyRJeLtGpT2zWU6WoTChBZyUBr 4/4Ch6fj9Dq8/GKUJqle2ML8aGKD3EodRihZmjbexM5aj3CRMw2h6z6Bg4C80JmvBacS JcUps4lZUGmGTQBPNWWOxmQKrkkdMls4WkxgrD9jHYxE3PQ44XuuXMleAIIe8z7bksXL 5R+KUk5UMgBHZALx1Yee0UkiKh9x7UKNTk09tx98SzCy9jyWLYU2UNYsHahzIcscJdED O84Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mJKNzn/1jIrRW1cj/snidt27QLUDKZl0T2dhPuK2+NTuT0YMYy6kLlA38luRgu94trumE28QlfxRXErQ== X-Received: by 10.36.144.132 with SMTP id x126mr6738211itd.35.1488416122356; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:55:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.224.137 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:55:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87varscxww.fsf@tethera.net> References: <87inntut68.fsf@tethera.net> <877f48lw4s.fsf@bistromath> <87varscxww.fsf@tethera.net> From: Olaf TNSB Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 11:55:21 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Add (extracted) attachment text to the search index? To: David Bremner Cc: Steven Allen , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c07f74e4051fb0549b4e242 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:55:24 -0000 --94eb2c07f74e4051fb0549b4e242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:41 AM, David Bremner wrote: > There has been some patches (related to encrypted email), that reindex > individual messages. So that would be a clean fix for that. I haven't > really thought about reindexing parts of messages, which is what seems > to be the proposal here. Oooh. That's brilliant! I would have never got to the point of thinking of attachments and re-indexing rather than separately of encrypted email, emails with (PDF/TXT/DOCX) attachments. Then the issues collapses down to two different components 1 - re-indexing messages 2 - plugins/external tools for different attachment types - hello mimetypes! Simple! So you'll have a patch and next release by this weekend? :-P --94eb2c07f74e4051fb0549b4e242 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:41 AM, David= Bremner <david@tethera.net>= wrote:
> There has been some patches (related to encrypted email), t= hat reindex
> individual messages. So that would be a clean fix for t= hat. I haven't
> really thought about reindexing parts of message= s, which is what seems
> to be the proposal here.

Oooh.= =C2=A0 That's brilliant!=C2=A0 I would have never got to the point of t= hinking of attachments and re-indexing rather than separately of encrypted = email, emails with (PDF/TXT/DOCX) attachments.

Then the issues= collapses down to two different components
1 - re-indexing messag= es
2 - plugins/external tools for different attachment types=C2=A0= - hello mimetypes!

Simple!=C2=A0 So you&#= 39;ll have a patch and next release by this weekend?=C2=A0=C2=A0 :-P

--94eb2c07f74e4051fb0549b4e242--