From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA120431FAF for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BL+--t8SEjLT for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2AC431FAE for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oi10so1307158obb.26 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=/2/FnH4eE+71wfLTbIyFh4EFDbTzAm7EpB20GDoUde8=; b=XTS1HuMhDJ7zd6hNCLzRf/udmwy6DZE0mqxLOlu+Ar+mZqEU4OmD1esWhc2Q1mSo12 Ifhf1NDwH2hvuR9SsrruChaBKIDyxIJv88jODPq9oYP00JJ1lxy3FvmEy357h3xaOZcn skJZ/FOB0UJ3bgPlp2y09DcHo4R6Ktd8qhOff0fXQx/QXkhhqHHIffZf8jTIuSgajFNT T6+1uo70jLF5t/pGKkUJ1F5SS71zbz91S4FPR2Pf8QAQ7jxJE4x37tJRbcRbtbyskwx1 jC8y2sUbkHVJQUeVMdEcxL7E/IpHsOc8oxEayhiqqDVb4/DP6ha4/Qfsh41T8toxncBN Xujw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.95.133 with SMTP id dk5mr2852403obb.14.1354102150634; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.69.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.69.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <87zk24ctko.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> <50B3871B.2050509@gmail.com> <87r4ngcl00.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> <50B48627.9040409@gmail.com> <50B5BDFF.1080802@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:29:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap From: Jani Nikula To: Felipe Contreras Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklvfDDxB+JlbXp72sjzVzQl6HP1Z2WjqpK6VK3qH8AMAaOHH8JRBRAz+CY8OgjSJhszYYW Cc: Notmuch Mail , Rainer@krugs.de X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:29:12 -0000 --14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras" wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > > >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible idea, since this > >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do. > > > > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding gmail / other server > > communication is not the best idea. > > And I disagree. Which part do you disagree with, before or after "and", or both? Care to elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions? BR, Jani. --14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible idea, since this
> >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.
> >
> > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding gmail / other server
> > communication is not the best idea.
>
> And I disagree.

Which part do you disagree with, before or after "and", or both? Care to elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions?

BR,
Jani.

--14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988--