unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+grubix+git@gmail.com>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Test failure in Ubuntu 22.04 and 22.10 (new test)
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 18:54:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA19uiSPfSq8rUTtVb1g=yuwc4k6Li4LAcOfBBoSbLWzpFUzBA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871qrkx655.fsf@tethera.net>

Am Do., 6. Okt. 2022 um 18:34 Uhr schrieb David Bremner <david@tethera.net>:
>
> Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+grubix+git@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Yes, lto-wrapper calls make.
> >
> > Are we compiling test functions on the fly during the test? In that
> > case we need to make sure that each test depends on the build
> > products, or else the test helper compilation and its users might run
> > in parallel ...
>
> Yes, we compile C code on the fly during the run of the tests. I'm not
> really clear on what race condition you are anticipating, as neither the
> compilation nor the other parts of the test are directly run by make.
> Execution is sequential within each T*.sh file. Unless gcc is returning
> before it has finished compilation (which I think we'd all agree would
> be gcc bug), I don't see how a race can arise there. One thing I can
> imagine happening is gcc's recursive invocation of make somehow fails
> under make -j, possibly something to do with violated assumptions about
> the jobserver and/or environment variables.

What I mean is:
make calls T*.sh
T*.sh calls gcc
gcc calls make (for lto)

Could it be that within a parallel make session, that gcc-make-call
gets delegated to the master make jobserver and thus gcc returns too
early? Wild speculation, I admit.
I haven't checked the code, but having those testhelpers as
prerequisites of the test scripts may help in that case.

Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-06 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1574005238.8760268.1665051216411.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2022-10-06 10:13 ` Test failure in Ubuntu 22.04 and 22.10 (new test) Gianfranco Costamagna
2022-10-06 10:42   ` David Bremner
2022-10-06 11:22     ` David Bremner
     [not found]       ` <CAA19uiS0EfEaUdgC0FJU1hzDH-_vXFL6Cn8Et7yZgcXKuF49Wg@mail.gmail.com>
2022-10-06 16:34         ` David Bremner
2022-10-06 16:54           ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2022-10-06 17:15             ` David Bremner
2022-10-10 17:27             ` Tomi Ollila

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA19uiSPfSq8rUTtVb1g=yuwc4k6Li4LAcOfBBoSbLWzpFUzBA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=michaeljgruber+grubix+git@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@tethera.net \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).