From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCC3431FB6 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:38:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dyJJWOecBCvv for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:38:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F02B431FAE for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:38:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by dady25 with SMTP id y25so728800dad.26 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:38:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nickurak.ca; s=google-dkim; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Il3a+ueWmxLt8LGWvwNlT/SPmvfwUTNPQrKBsmujjco=; b=O1TP+mn41RkuiG7csH40eRZh3xmE7mWza8EB5gUqJv6l3wMqLO5y8IK1IJDBwPdLjQ b4xkoW7YQuDXyomQGNXtVtDr9bePnIs3dolCg1MIKkYzsaFJ2Mo/kd74z8kd/Vu2ZDBj qg59QIjZgLyB0/hUQiAx0PUq7AVdepBjg7T5E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.216.138 with SMTP id oq10mr10919223pbc.85.1331228312506; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:38:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: jeremy@nickurak.ca Received: by 10.68.228.42 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:38:32 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.221.197.58] In-Reply-To: <4F58E962.1050403@fifthhorseman.net> References: <87k42vrqve.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net> <87ipif2fdn.fsf@wyzanski.jamesvasile.com> <4F58E962.1050403@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:38:32 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1_sl2UIMbywzGKvatmc9BLQsNR8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? From: Jeremy Nickurak To: notmuch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlwAw35DwXun8NdZPPp1qUUcc0H16M8Bhm5+7GysyXehkbmpiHYf1uOiBEQ4nQr8eAQ3mea X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:38:33 -0000 On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Any other suggestions or ideas? What about representing the contents from both message in one apparent message? - Aggregate the headers together, perhaps? - Where headers disagree, display both - If the bodies disagree, display both.