From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jeremy@nickurak.ca>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCC3431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:38:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id dyJJWOecBCvv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:38:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com
	[209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F02B431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:38:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dady25 with SMTP id y25so728800dad.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:38:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=nickurak.ca; s=google-dkim;
	h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=Il3a+ueWmxLt8LGWvwNlT/SPmvfwUTNPQrKBsmujjco=;
	b=O1TP+mn41RkuiG7csH40eRZh3xmE7mWza8EB5gUqJv6l3wMqLO5y8IK1IJDBwPdLjQ
	b4xkoW7YQuDXyomQGNXtVtDr9bePnIs3dolCg1MIKkYzsaFJ2Mo/kd74z8kd/Vu2ZDBj
	qg59QIjZgLyB0/hUQiAx0PUq7AVdepBjg7T5E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.216.138 with SMTP id oq10mr10919223pbc.85.1331228312506;
	Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:38:32 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jeremy@nickurak.ca
Received: by 10.68.228.42 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:38:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [128.221.197.58]
In-Reply-To: <4F58E962.1050403@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <87k42vrqve.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>
	<87ipif2fdn.fsf@wyzanski.jamesvasile.com>
	<4F58E962.1050403@fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:38:32 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1_sl2UIMbywzGKvatmc9BLQsNR8
Message-ID: <CA+eQo_3x+VJMoB1U1R-vvk==u4x6drKikHrr=HHZZnsZEE7PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?
From: Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca>
To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlwAw35DwXun8NdZPPp1qUUcc0H16M8Bhm5+7GysyXehkbmpiHYf1uOiBEQ4nQr8eAQ3mea
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:38:33 -0000

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> Any other suggestions or ideas?

What about representing the contents from both message in one apparent message?

- Aggregate the headers together, perhaps?
- Where headers disagree, display both
- If the bodies disagree, display both.