From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC0B40F229 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:01:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dIZ6IwSX9utB for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:01:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5750F414F6F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:01:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by qcha6 with SMTP id a6so2260407qch.26 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:01:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nickurak.ca; s=google-dkim; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7qgV2kqY7p+otz9oCixZSWmtUq3ElPwf8b4vVgHdzz8=; b=MZIdDEKkVM/YjXjnXNRSDqJn3OPv6K3jzXgKSxy++x5Y2xhIotG+3xfFS6GyjiYq/K CQ1s2zM7nMToDTBrgxjUpQz7IoA/gkqc5mUZsQloH16MM05YklsHVFbutZGwkTNwB2hR x6zdOg/4dGwNq0IGSl+MG1yItsbdsQC/OoOuY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.135.136 with SMTP id n8mr4764056qct.137.1326060090658; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:01:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: jeremy@nickurak.ca Received: by 10.229.40.149 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:01:30 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.148.28.35] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:01:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ErFs2dL8rqNwNPfyFRnp-REI4b4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] emacs: bind 'r' to reply-to-sender and 'R' to reply-to-all From: Jeremy Nickurak To: Jani Nikula Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 22:01:32 -0000 On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 14:48, Jani Nikula wrote: > It seemed to me that most people wanted this, and nobody spoke for keeping > the old binding now that we have reply-to-sender. This as a separate patch > so it's easy to drop if needed. FWIW, I generally prefer reply-all as the default. In my experience, when a message is sent to a bunch of people, it's usually treated as a "forum" discussion where everybody wants to be in on everything. Also, once you've started composing, it's much easier to delete people you don't want included than to add people who are no longer referenced in the new buffer at all.