From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BA46DE01CE for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:47:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVb0xBvqRhT5 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com (mail-io1-f48.google.com [209.85.166.48]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F5E6DE01BB for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id v10so1476808ios.13 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:47:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=trk-nickurak-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e+tqSNIRc5Wqypfe+Qw22KQ7WlIva9yHhDOTRib1630=; b=mUsBnOl1QCZ2ijHtlBTKxZX6Z9o7XqogVaRcG9BsuxHwYZbOr2/5QOeWBt43ssDAC3 PrLLwr2zoXAMm3VqPr4nCD4VOAUQTc2Da4O6InaAFjYCkpfE8p/V51sBUUgSHMml4yrt o6hM2kOHe57fCcEJzem2EQPAj9ZVfLGHBFbPuhYqRDkB0/Mv0xGatroAN3ol7Q1sNHsI /jqA1fziIp+vjReZU3LBi9vXKoa4YYrOoM1kg0EJsMyOY7P4ZKLJ1l41GdEXkHESPC5D cEwdOyNFBjbNozmw+O2YqyOMfQMdQ9u5B1d7aafMkBbz9BdVDRPez6LVKkDtNxV2/nVk JHVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=e+tqSNIRc5Wqypfe+Qw22KQ7WlIva9yHhDOTRib1630=; b=Y/WmtEgNKl5bm3jKHvlAzVp+A6gdX7d/xC1kuXQFSd056WlFi1qr27FMChAVdy/giH Qu3H5lSocD4p66XMbJxybfv8Fqa406A2UTcyZXxOdCp+zsUv8OIYO0QLTbhR1IlubQ4T GTRVpp0fsm+XeMOwYe7ttRQtX1X78mS797DTwGGlPLynuaD70A86akDsw9QTkg1+58G/ hFKN2Ufx6JIumGSt2hGbGJF+gajqAB35soS3exQ3CKbllKdXLaXArvWwKfJXCY1ShABM OrGuMWa7gMtEggkVzhu/baC4mTG+KVy0rmgITO/jEMgjRxArV8dLYVhqbGxu0ENOrIVl IlQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYfwN7hZTNA/N3XlFrb5dNjjlZ+xgGrxGyVO9km8+8wDxUZ7EIv JWG3cPcIFCjnjilH+FnJ4oGkHR2q0lxSSJ3x+TMtDMksdfc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WLMe6V/yoRoqVXTvHMOA7MhRszwqQXTaGhm0dfbuoGnMPh1FwcNBOgRq78A5tzyYM10zeTau+dVSjguSB/L1s= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8e8e:: with SMTP id q136mr8377628iod.226.1542908841976; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:47:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181122124515.GB28358@lati.localdomain> <878t1l2f1p.fsf@tethera.net> In-Reply-To: <878t1l2f1p.fsf@tethera.net> From: Jeremy Nickurak Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:47:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FEATURE] Purge ignored messages from index To: Notmuch Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000728dc1057b4475fb" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:47:24 -0000 --000000000000728dc1057b4475fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Don't they need to be in the index in order to match the ignore condition, which then allows them to be excluded from usual activities? What's the actual thing you're hoping to achieve by not having those ignored messages be in the index? On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:33 AM David Bremner wrote: > Markus Weimar writes: > > > Indexed but subsequently ignored messages remain indexed. I suggest to > purge them from the index as if the files were removed. > > > > Example: > > > > * Create index including spam directory > > * Add spam directory to ignore list > > * Neither =C2=B4new=C2=B4 nor =C2=B4reindex 'folder:spam'=C2=B4 purges = the spam messages > from the index > > > > My first instinct would be to leave new as is, but change reindex to pay > attention to some ignore parameter. > > d > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch > --000000000000728dc1057b4475fb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Don't they need to be in the index in order to match t= he ignore condition, which then allows them to be excluded from usual activ= ities?

What's the actual thing you're hoping to = achieve by not having those ignored messages be in the index?
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:33= AM David Bremner <david@tethera.ne= t> wrote:
Markus Weimar <= markus.weimar@= gmail.com> writes:

> Indexed but subsequently ignored messages remain indexed. I suggest to= =C2=A0 purge them from the index as if the files were removed.
>
> Example:
>
> * Create index including spam directory
> * Add spam directory to ignore list
> * Neither =C2=B4new=C2=B4 nor =C2=B4reindex 'folder:spam'=C2= =B4 purges the spam messages from the index
>

My first instinct would be to leave new as is, but change reindex to pay attention to some ignore parameter.

d
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuc= hmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch=
--000000000000728dc1057b4475fb--