* Add support for `thread` field in `notmuch show`
@ 2020-04-29 16:18 Ciprian Dorin Craciun
2020-05-01 12:09 ` David Bremner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ciprian Dorin Craciun @ 2020-04-29 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: notmuch
According to the `devel/schemata` the message object doesn't contain
the thread identifier to which it was assigned in the database.
Sometimes, for example in an UI that displays a search result at
message level, it would be useful to know the thread each message
belongs to, so the user can easily switch to the entire thread.
I know that one can use `thread:{id:MESSAGE_ID}` to achieve the same
result, however:
* it is somewhat cumbersome for the integrator;
* having the thread identifier explicitly, could be used as a key in a
cache, or other internal lookups;
In fact the only way one can extract the thread identifier via the
`notmuch` CLI is to use `notmuch search --output=threads --
id:MESSAGE_ID`
Ciprian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Add support for `thread` field in `notmuch show`
2020-04-29 16:18 Add support for `thread` field in `notmuch show` Ciprian Dorin Craciun
@ 2020-05-01 12:09 ` David Bremner
2020-05-01 12:14 ` David Bremner
2020-05-01 12:17 ` Ciprian Dorin Craciun
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Bremner @ 2020-05-01 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ciprian Dorin Craciun, notmuch
Ciprian Dorin Craciun <ciprian.craciun@gmail.com> writes:
> I know that one can use `thread:{id:MESSAGE_ID}` to achieve the same
> result, however:
> * it is somewhat cumbersome for the integrator;
Out of curiousity, what is harder about it? In both cases you have to
extra one value from the JSON.
> * having the thread identifier explicitly, could be used as a key in a
> cache, or other internal lookups;
>
> In fact the only way one can extract the thread identifier via the
> `notmuch` CLI is to use `notmuch search --output=threads --
> id:MESSAGE_ID`
Offhand I have no strong objection to someone (who is not me) adding
this. I think it's important to be aware that thread id's are ephemeral,
and subject to change e.g. if the database is re-built from
scratch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Add support for `thread` field in `notmuch show`
2020-05-01 12:09 ` David Bremner
@ 2020-05-01 12:14 ` David Bremner
2020-05-01 12:17 ` Ciprian Dorin Craciun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Bremner @ 2020-05-01 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ciprian Dorin Craciun, notmuch
David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
> Offhand I have no strong objection to someone (who is not me) adding
> this. I think it's important to be aware that thread id's are ephemeral,
> and subject to change e.g. if the database is re-built from
> scratch.
I guess a more common/interesting case is that two threads can merge if
new is indexed.
d
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Add support for `thread` field in `notmuch show`
2020-05-01 12:09 ` David Bremner
2020-05-01 12:14 ` David Bremner
@ 2020-05-01 12:17 ` Ciprian Dorin Craciun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ciprian Dorin Craciun @ 2020-05-01 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Bremner; +Cc: notmuch
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> Ciprian Dorin Craciun <ciprian.craciun@gmail.com> writes:
> > I know that one can use `thread:{id:MESSAGE_ID}` to achieve the same
> > result, however:
> > * it is somewhat cumbersome for the integrator;
>
> Out of curiousity, what is harder about it? In both cases you have to
> extra one value from the JSON.
It is cumbersome because:
* for once, now you need for each email to run a new `notmuch search`
instance to get that email's thread id; this is very sub-optimal when
you have more than a handful emails;
* secondly, it adds more code to the client;
To understand my use-case: I currently intend to use `notmuch show
--format=json` to search my emails, and based on that to generate a
nice HTML page, displaying all found emails. Now I want to include in
each email's section a link to only display the thread.
In order to do that, I either have to generate (by usin the technique
described above) the `thread:...` for each of those emails, which in
turn generates one CLI call per email. (And 99% of the time perhaps I
don't even click the thread.) (Another option would be to use the
`thread:{id:...}` for that link, but I find this quite a hack.)
> > * having the thread identifier explicitly, could be used as a key in a
> > cache, or other internal lookups;
> >
> > In fact the only way one can extract the thread identifier via the
> > `notmuch` CLI is to use `notmuch search --output=threads --
> > id:MESSAGE_ID`
>
> Offhand I have no strong objection to someone (who is not me) adding
> this. I think it's important to be aware that thread id's are ephemeral,
> and subject to change e.g. if the database is re-built from
> scratch.
I understand that `thread:...` is tied to a particular database, but
that shouldn't be an issue, as people don't regenerate often their
databases, and the caches are usually short-lived.
This weekend I'll try to take a stab at adding this to `notmuch`.
Ciprian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-01 12:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-29 16:18 Add support for `thread` field in `notmuch show` Ciprian Dorin Craciun
2020-05-01 12:09 ` David Bremner
2020-05-01 12:14 ` David Bremner
2020-05-01 12:17 ` Ciprian Dorin Craciun
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).