* notmuch development @ 2010-09-21 15:38 Scott Henson 2010-09-21 20:32 ` Carl Worth 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Scott Henson @ 2010-09-21 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: notmuch [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 225 bytes --] It seems to me that development on notmuch has slowed down recently? Lots of patches sitting in the patch queue and not much movement on the git repository? Am I missing where the development is going on? -- Scott Henson [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 443 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: notmuch development 2010-09-21 15:38 notmuch development Scott Henson @ 2010-09-21 20:32 ` Carl Worth 2010-09-21 21:05 ` Jameson Rollins 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Carl Worth @ 2010-09-21 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Scott Henson, notmuch [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 864 bytes --] On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:38:46 -0400, Scott Henson <scott@foolishpride.org> wrote: > It seems to me that development on notmuch has slowed down recently? Lots > of patches sitting in the patch queue and not much movement on the git > repository? Am I missing where the development is going on? Yes. The git repository has been almost entirely stagnant for the last several months. That was due to me not finding the chance to do notmuch development on a regular basis for some months. Fortunately, I've just recently (in the past week) started doing development again, and I'm optimistic that I'll be able to keep this up going forward. Also, if anyone has any suggestions for things that we could do to improve things if I have to "disappear" again in the future, then I would be happy to do what I can. -Carl -- carl.d.worth@intel.com [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: notmuch development 2010-09-21 20:32 ` Carl Worth @ 2010-09-21 21:05 ` Jameson Rollins 2010-09-21 22:22 ` Carl Worth 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jameson Rollins @ 2010-09-21 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carl Worth, notmuch [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 758 bytes --] On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:32:30 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote: > Also, if anyone has any suggestions for things that we could do to > improve things if I have to "disappear" again in the future, then I > would be happy to do what I can. Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is delegating some lieutenants to handle processing patches. There definitely are some worthy candidates (who are kind of already doing this already). Even if they're not actually pushing patches into a canonical repo, they could at least vet in-coming patches and prep things for your review. If they could present you with branches that are potentially "ready to go" it might make things a lot easier for you, especially when you're in a crunch. jamie. [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: notmuch development 2010-09-21 21:05 ` Jameson Rollins @ 2010-09-21 22:22 ` Carl Worth 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Carl Worth @ 2010-09-21 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jameson Rollins, notmuch [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1407 bytes --] On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:12 -0400, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote: > Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is delegating some > lieutenants to handle processing patches. There definitely are some > worthy candidates (who are kind of already doing this already). Even if > they're not actually pushing patches into a canonical repo, they could > at least vet in-coming patches and prep things for your review. If they > could present you with branches that are potentially "ready to go" it > might make things a lot easier for you, especially when you're in a > crunch. Yes. Other people can definitely help me, particular as I gain trust in their ability to review, accept, and reject patches in a similar way to what I would have done myself. I do like that patches are in general sent to the mailing list, and I'd like that to continue. I use searches based on the list messages to determine patches that I still need to review, (though, obviously I'm quite a ways behind in this process). As people review and accept patches, I'd love to receive mail addressed specifically to me, (can copy the list as well, of course), with pointers to git repositories that have "accepted" patches integrated into them. That will definitely help me prioritize pulling such patches into the canonical repository. -Carl -- carl.d.worth@intel.com [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-21 22:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-09-21 15:38 notmuch development Scott Henson 2010-09-21 20:32 ` Carl Worth 2010-09-21 21:05 ` Jameson Rollins 2010-09-21 22:22 ` Carl Worth
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/ This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).