unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* [PATCH] fix compiler warnings
@ 2009-11-22 15:11 Dirk-Jan C. Binnema
  2009-11-23  3:22 ` Carl Worth
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dirk-Jan C. Binnema @ 2009-11-22 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: notmuch@notmuchmail org


(hopefully this is the correct way to send patches...)

With these minor changes, notmuch compiles warning-free with gcc 4.4.1

---
 notmuch-new.c   |    4 +++-
 notmuch-setup.c |   13 +++++++------
 notmuch-tag.c   |    4 +++-
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/notmuch-new.c b/notmuch-new.c
index 0dd2784..88b48a6 100644
--- a/notmuch-new.c
+++ b/notmuch-new.c
@@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ static void
 handle_sigint (unused (int sig))
 {
     static char msg[] = "Stopping...         \n";
-    write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1);
+    if (write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1) < 0) {
+	    /* ignore...*/
+    }
     interrupted = 1;
 }
 
diff --git a/notmuch-setup.c b/notmuch-setup.c
index 482efd2..0d3f186 100644
--- a/notmuch-setup.c
+++ b/notmuch-setup.c
@@ -99,12 +99,13 @@ notmuch_setup_command (unused (void *ctx),
     unsigned int i;
     int is_new;
 
-#define prompt(format, ...)				\
-    do {						\
-	printf (format, ##__VA_ARGS__);			\
-	fflush (stdout);				\
-	getline (&response, &response_size, stdin);	\
-	chomp_newline (response);			\
+#define prompt(format, ...)					\
+    do {							\
+	printf (format, ##__VA_ARGS__);				\
+	fflush (stdout);					\
+	if (getline (&response, &response_size, stdin) < 0)	\
+		break;						\
+	chomp_newline (response);				\
     } while (0)
 
     config = notmuch_config_open (ctx, NULL, &is_new);
diff --git a/notmuch-tag.c b/notmuch-tag.c
index e2311f6..5e40f50 100644
--- a/notmuch-tag.c
+++ b/notmuch-tag.c
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@ static void
 handle_sigint (unused (int sig))
 {
     static char msg[] = "Stopping...         \n";
-    write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1);
+    if (write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1) < 0) {
+	    /* ignore... */
+    }
     interrupted = 1;
 }
 
-- 
1.6.3.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] fix compiler warnings
  2009-11-22 15:11 [PATCH] fix compiler warnings Dirk-Jan C. Binnema
@ 2009-11-23  3:22 ` Carl Worth
  2009-11-23  4:43   ` Jeffrey Ollie
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carl Worth @ 2009-11-23  3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: djcb, notmuch@notmuchmail org

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:11:03 +0200, Dirk-Jan C. Binnema <djcb.bulk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> (hopefully this is the correct way to send patches...)

Looks just fine, and welcome to notmuch!

> With these minor changes, notmuch compiles warning-free with gcc 4.4.1

Could you resend these as separate patches, each patch fixing a single
type of warning? That would make it more clear what the code is doing.

> -    write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1);
> +    if (write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1) < 0) {
> +	    /* ignore...*/
> +    }

I don't like the gratuitous conditional here. It clutters the code and
make is less clear. If we're just trying to squelch a warning about an
unused return value from a function, then I think I'd rather see:

	ssize_t ignored;

        ignored = write (2, msg, sizeof (msg) - 1);

What do you think?

-Carl

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] fix compiler warnings
  2009-11-23  3:22 ` Carl Worth
@ 2009-11-23  4:43   ` Jeffrey Ollie
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Ollie @ 2009-11-23  4:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Carl Worth; +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail org, djcb

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:11:03 +0200, Dirk-Jan C. Binnema <djcb.bulk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> -    write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1);
>> +    if (write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1) < 0) {
>> +         /* ignore...*/
>> +    }
>
> I don't like the gratuitous conditional here. It clutters the code and
> make is less clear. If we're just trying to squelch a warning about an
> unused return value from a function, then I think I'd rather see:
>
>        ssize_t ignored;
>
>        ignored = write (2, msg, sizeof (msg) - 1);

Isn't the usual method for ignoring return values casting to void?

(void) write (2, msg, sizeof (msg) - 1);

-- 
Jeff Ollie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-23  4:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-22 15:11 [PATCH] fix compiler warnings Dirk-Jan C. Binnema
2009-11-23  3:22 ` Carl Worth
2009-11-23  4:43   ` Jeffrey Ollie

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).