From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1D54196F0 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:28:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z3v1G-w+39z4 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3043F431FC1 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so342725wwi.26 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.173.74 with SMTP id u52mr2354681wel.204.1272281299353; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com [83.217.165.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z34sm637416wbv.8.2010.04.26.04.28.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 377D759413B; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:28:29 +0100 (BST) To: Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Wrapping up the 0.3 release In-Reply-To: <87ljcchnfc.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87ljcchnfc.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-191-g4256215 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:28:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87zl0q312a.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:28:22 -0000 On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:37:11 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > Meanwhile, I'm aware of two regressions I'd like to see fixed before > 0.3: > > * Reply is now splitting the window > > We're copying the original message into the new reply buffer, so > what's the advantage of splitting here? Patch sent. > * Composing a new message with 'm' brings up headers in a scrambled > order. > > A minor point, but it would be nice to fix this. Patch sent. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org