From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE194196F0 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:19:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fQk3MIAb+Bka; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC667431FC1; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 983E1568F2D; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Nelson Elhage , Jameson Rollins Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: Respect LDFLAGS from the environment. In-Reply-To: <20100512172955.GB32152@mit.edu> References: <1273682752-19140-1-git-send-email-nelhage@ksplice.com> <87wrv9caxg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <20100512172955.GB32152@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-22-g1d528f8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:19:36 -0700 Message-ID: <87zkzbd26v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 01:19:47 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 12 May 2010 13:29:55 -0400, Nelson Elhage wrote: > Hm. You're probably right that it should be ${LDFLAGS:-} for > consistency with the others, but what I wrote is functionally correct: Thanks for the lesson! I learned something new. I've committed this change now, (with the assignment consistent with the others in the file). > (Of course, as long as the default is empty and we're not running > under 'set -u', we could just remove the line entirely. But I think > it's good for the sake of explicitness.) I merged this commit in with Tomas' earlier commit, which was functionally identical, but didn't have that line at all. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMCFSo6JDdNq8qSWgRAhzOAJwJkYtw9QEOQnSLkOsk7PmoRXGuCACcCRSY UOOqdZ6auQ4NiAqL6SDd7XQ= =r3DS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--