From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB83431FAF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id tIXRyTkBkHnC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A99431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
	id 1X09Aa-0004Kw-Jh; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:52:52 -0300
Received: (nullmailer pid 8507 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 26 Jun 2014
	12:52:49 -0000
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Thomas Klausner <tk@giga.or.at>
Subject: Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility
 problem
In-Reply-To: <87a98zho9y.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <20140103214735.GG27614@danbala.tuwien.ac.at>
	<sfid--20140408-140907--004.35-1@spamfilter.osbf.lua>
	<87ob0c6p0e.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<20140408123312.GZ5053@danbala.tuwien.ac.at>
	<87a98zho9y.fsf@zancas.localnet>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:52:49 -0300
Message-ID: <87zjgzg7dq.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: Notmuch list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:53:01 -0000

David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:

> Is it correct that the statically linked version (notmuch) worked OK but
> the dynamically linked version (notmuch-shared) failed? That's
> consistent with what I observe on Debian, it's just that here the
> dynamically linked version falls back on the canonicalize_file_name in
> glibc, hiding the error.

Actually I'm wrong about this part. or at least I don't know how to test
this on a glibc based system. My suggested test with nm is bogus, since
all symbols from libnotmuch.so will show up the same way.

d