From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF996DE0FF8 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:45:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.113 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.113 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pNek23zwqs4n for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B3456DE0FF7 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zesm0-0003q4-Jp; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:44:24 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 8308 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:44:05 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Xu Wang Subject: Re: Possible some threads are not complete due to bug? In-Reply-To: References: <87fv2a4ctt.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+73~gd432116 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:44:05 -0300 Message-ID: <87zj0c3gei.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:45:54 -0000 Xu Wang writes: > Because when I do a notmuch search for that message by message ID with > --output=threads, it gives a different thread ID. > >> Isn't that what your first command tells you? > Well yes, but I wanted to confirm that that is indeed the reason. I > have heard in someone saying that debugging is process of confirming > things that should be true. I'm still confused. It sounds like you gave the same command twice and got different answers. Can you maybe show the complete sequence of commands and output (assuming it's not too large)? d