From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C716DE00E1 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:37:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.019 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tpf2YOY0bPGM for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841EB6DE00BB for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A604F997; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:37:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87B1420143; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:37:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? In-Reply-To: <87wpo6fvju.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87lh4nm62m.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87wpo6fvju.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+124~gbf604e9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:37:34 -0400 Message-ID: <87ziszson5.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 23:37:47 -0000 On Sat 2016-04-09 15:09:57 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > I don't see it in "0.21+99~gd93d377" with emacs -q. Can you try that, > and if there is some settings issue? did you script your test? if so, would you mind sharing your script? i think your emacs-fu is superior to mine. --dkg