From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394746DE012F for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.017 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28onrCz9yzqz for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75B106DE0127 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1apmmN-0003Sh-7P; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:06:07 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 29663 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 01:05:56 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? In-Reply-To: <87oa9fsl9i.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> References: <87lh4nm62m.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87wpo6fvju.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ziszson5.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <8760vn7k5g.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87oa9fsl9i.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+99~gd93d377 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:05:56 -0300 Message-ID: <87zisz63gr.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 01:06:08 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > On Mon 2016-04-11 20:20:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote: >> I have the feeling I don't understand the problem. I replied to your >> message, and didn't see any extra indentation there. I thought my reply >> to the list was test enough. So what am I missing? > > Aha, it is due to a setting, thanks. it's due to > notmuch-show-indent-multipart -- try setting it to "t" ? > > i find that setting useful during notmuch-show buffers, but i don't > think it should apply when generating a reply message. OK, I see what you mean. I guess the idea is that reply should look as much like show as possible/sensible. I know mark and (other) david have been tweaking that part of the emacs UI lately, so maybe they have some ideas. d