From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B106DE14C3 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 06:31:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KR9UvIuGGgXO for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 06:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57EE96DE14C2 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 06:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpERp-0001Av-PO; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 09:31:09 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 17165 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:31:50 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Github an licensing In-Reply-To: <87innposnq.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <87d1dxjmup.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87innposnq.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:31:50 -0300 Message-ID: <87zigilni1.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:31:55 -0000 Mark Walters writes: >> On irc rlb pointed me to >> https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/removing_everything_from_github/ >> >> IANAL so I don't know whether it is a real problem, a hypothetical >> problem or not a problem. > > I got a couple of links sent to me privately which look relevant: > > * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13767373 > * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13766933 > > (hacker threads, but from people claiming to be lawyers) Another comment, from the FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/do-githubs-updated-terms-of-service-conflict-with-copyleft