From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01823431FB6 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:02:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GcgE5U5wSPgk for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:02:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.25]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AD6431FB5 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:02:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [87.180.51.55] (helo=stokes.schwinge.homeip.net) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1PjV2w-0001HF-QO for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:02:19 +0100 Received: (qmail 17498 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2011 11:01:52 -0000 Received: from kepler.schwinge.homeip.net (192.168.111.7) by stokes.schwinge.homeip.net with QMQP; 30 Jan 2011 11:01:52 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 3770 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:01:52 -0000 From: Thomas Schwinge To: Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a few tests for searching LWN emails. In-Reply-To: <87vd18n6j9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <1296124309-20072-1-git-send-email-thomas@schwinge.name> <87vd18n6j9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-33-g665f77b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:01:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87y662odt0.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: thomas@schwinge.name X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:02:24 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hallo! On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000, Carl Worth wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:31:49 -0700, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > These tests should pass -- but they currently don't. > Thanks for sending these test cases. This is actually my favorite way to > receive bug reports. I really appreciate it! I'm doing this for a simple resons: I won't manually have to remember (!) and later re-run my testings in order to confirm that the issue has been fixed. :-) > So I'm not sure what could reasonably be changed here in GMime or not. I > definitely do want to fix notmuch so that it indexes all of the text > here regardless if it's formatted in an RFC-compliant way or not. Given Matthieu's comment, I wouldn't; as I explained in my reply to his email. Now, if this is indeed a GMIME issue -- do we want these tests in notmuch at all, or should I rather (adapt and) submit them for GMIME? > [*] Except for test VI which has a bug in that it searches for the word > "mailing" in the subject header, but no such word exists in the > message's subject header. Ack. Fixed locally. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Thomas --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNRUUbAAoJEGe3hdm9kOii0gsIAMkASbapuzfC8ikhqAhMlp0d mKQAnP2knECijMjpNlP0sopw3AnSVskINNq151e7xy3AatFpF9MqvJAuyUQZi3py tnV+4fZYANDzAFd2PSaYNs/f0IH0DIgK3OjTmOIG8PRCm+dDSic/nL/xqAl+Z3Rx kgbtE46arAfuhfToXLXt3/5ypgB61zsoZtmGY/AH2Xb5JlLAy3YSEic2ZQwLJrj4 euNDXNIFvcFEFuyq1GTsL0k2VjVuogPXHVyzOtvzakjKVLRPES32d//LESdJZPQ2 ULqT0/EXor9FRmVLTiuOORyI3rzmK2xpcL6Nf+mN1vAndiM5rL0svJ5ROkCOPQM= =kmTW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--