From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876B5429E26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  3 Dec 2011 10:32:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.686
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.614]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id UDU5u7-Q4GSF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat,  3 Dec 2011 10:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1614429E25
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  3 Dec 2011 10:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocinante.cs.unb.ca ([204.239.250.1]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB3IWj7e026133
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sat, 3 Dec 2011 14:32:49 -0400
Received: from bremner by rocinante.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1RWuOB-0004gc-G2; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:43 -0800
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] have LATEST-notmuch-<version>.tar.gz on releases web
 page
In-Reply-To: <yf6ty5ttfs2.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
References: <yf6ty5ttfs2.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.1+45~g3a0a730 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:43 -0800
Message-ID: <87y5utsdys.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:32:59 -0000

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:41:01 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@nixu.com> wrote:
> The notmuchmail/releases page used to have LATEST-notmuch-<version>
> to link to the latest notmuch source tarball. This is confusing on
> web page and on disk when the file has been downloaded. This change
> looks a bit inconsistent with the 'rm' command just executed before.
> $(TAR_FILE) is defined (currently) as $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION).tar.gz;
> as long as the prefix stays $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION) and version begins
> with a digit then this line is good in execution point of view.

On IRC we talked about changing the rm command in this since I
bootstrapped the process by hand. Did you come to a conclusion one way
or the other?

d