From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tom.prince@ualberta.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F346431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 42aqK2OBOFPI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from socrates.hocat.ca (socrates.hocat.ca [76.10.188.53])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D3E431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.hocat.ca (hermes.hocat.ca [69.165.170.253])
	by socrates.hocat.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 5060D1AE3;
	Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:38:47 -0700 (MST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 14148 invoked by uid 1000);
	Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:38:45 -0000
From: Tom Prince <tom.prince@ualberta.net>
To: Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca>,
	notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?
In-Reply-To: <CA+eQo_3x+VJMoB1U1R-vvk==u4x6drKikHrr=HHZZnsZEE7PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87k42vrqve.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>
	<87ipif2fdn.fsf@wyzanski.jamesvasile.com>
	<4F58E962.1050403@fifthhorseman.net>
	<CA+eQo_3x+VJMoB1U1R-vvk==u4x6drKikHrr=HHZZnsZEE7PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+239~g4d2d96b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.2
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:38:44 -0500
Message-ID: <87y5r84aqj.fsf@hermes.hocat.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:38:51 -0000

On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:38:32 -0700, Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> > Any other suggestions or ideas?
> 
> What about representing the contents from both message in one apparent message?
> - ...
> - If the bodies disagree, display both.

We'd probably need to do some like doing a diff. I find it annoying
enough displaying both text and html copies of a mail. Displaying two
copies of a message, just because one of them has a few extra lines as a
footer would be equally annoying.

Maybe it would be enough to ignore the signature too, when comparing messages?