From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC0F431FAF for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:48:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.438 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koRF2YxxVNSu for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:48:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478BD431FAE for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:48:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTGBG-0000Qb-6J; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:46:10 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 17086 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:45:56 -0000 From: David Bremner To: "J. Lewis Muir" , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: make notmuch shared library install_name be full path on Mac OS X In-Reply-To: <54F74DA8.6020706@imca-cat.org> References: <1409541227-38895-1-git-send-email-jlmuir@imca-cat.org> <87twyao35q.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20150226181423.GA2822@bass.imca.aps.anl.gov> <54F74DA8.6020706@imca-cat.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+67~gdbe9924 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:45:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87y4nctrsr.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:48:39 -0000 "J. Lewis Muir" writes: > > I'm sorry for the confusing commit message. As per David's subsequent > email on this thread, I'll try submitting again with a better one. > Just for the record, I appreciate the effort to explain the problem. One convention that might be useful is that additional commentary not suitable for the commit message can be added below the -- line in a patch/message. David