From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B796DE0931 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 16:51:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.007 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6UZn6PT1fPG for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 16:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3066DE0222 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 16:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqqXK-0008Ie-9H; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 19:51:14 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 11792 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:51:25 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomas Nordin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch-show require gnus-art? In-Reply-To: <87intawukw.fsf@flaptop.tomnor.org> References: <87intawukw.fsf@flaptop.tomnor.org> Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 20:51:25 -0300 Message-ID: <87y426gvia.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:51:33 -0000 Tomas Nordin writes: > If notmuch-show-mode behaves badly for you in emacs 24.x try adding one of > > (setq gnus-inhibit-images nil) > > or > > (require 'gnus-art) > > to your .emacs file. > > So before going into further details (I will if somebody wants me to), I > wonder if you think there is a relation between my problem and the > described possibly bad notmuch-show-mode-behaviour? It doesn't sound related. The issue referred to is (iirc) a missing elisp function, so would generate an elisp backtrace, not an emacs crash. d