From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3396DE0119 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:12:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.115 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.105, RDNS_NONE=0.2, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wg-NCNOFiZYm for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (unknown [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8896DE00C4 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:11:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eFJTG-0007zf-Hd; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:40:42 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 30494 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:40:41 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] cli/new, insert, reindex: change index.try_decrypt to "auto" by default In-Reply-To: <20171025065203.24403-14-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> References: <20171025065203.24403-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <20171025065203.24403-14-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:40:41 -0400 Message-ID: <87y3n68khi.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:12:00 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > The new "auto" decryption policy is not only good for "notmuch show" > and "notmuch reindex". It's also useful for indexing messages -- > there's no good reason to not try to go ahead and index the cleartext > of a message that we have a stashed session key for. I'm confused here. You talk about indexing other than reindex, but the only tests that change are reindex? Is this meant to change "notmuch new" behaviour? d