From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A909A6DE136E for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:40:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.064 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.064 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.063, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BsT-BJV_i_BJ for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09EF6DE136C for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ifRVx-0002Tx-Pn; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:40:33 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 26891 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:40:32 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Berthold Lorke Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: non-threaded view In-Reply-To: <1864454735.7333.1576162089203@webmail.strato.com> References: <632101253.461599.1576113833299@webmail.strato.com> <87v9qlda8a.fsf@tethera.net> <1864454735.7333.1576162089203@webmail.strato.com> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:40:32 -0400 Message-ID: <87y2vh4hvj.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:40:40 -0000 Berthold Lorke writes: > thanks! no it doesn't. i guess there then is in fact an indexing error. > > you omitted a search term in the second line, i tried '*', with wildly different numbers. > > what could be the problem i have with indexing? I can't really understand what would cause "notmuch count '*'" to output something different than "notmuch search --output='*' | wc -l". I was thinking if they were both small, but equal, that would indicate "notmuch new" skipping many files.