From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Cc: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: Provide an option to make thread summaries keep initial subject
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 11:23:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y24wg1cq.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925193137.GM26662@mit.edu>
Hi!
Regarding the following ideas -- from almost a decade ago ;-) -- is
anyone aware of any work in that area?
On 2012-09-25T15:31:37-0400, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> Quoth Olivier Berger on Sep 25 at 6:03 pm:
>> Whenever a participant changes the subject in the middle of a thread,
>> the summary reported by notmuch search will change.
>>
>> However, the result is that some mails tend to "disappear" from search
>> results, when (bad) participants reply instead of composing a new mail,
>> and change a subject (see
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688699 for more details
>> on that problem, and a discussion). Of course, they're still there, but
>> their subject being masked, one may then grep or C-s for a particular
>> subject and miss them.
>>
>> I think it would be interesting to allow notmuch to potentially keep the
>> original subject and not the most recent one for the thread summaries.
>>
>> What do you think ?
>
> I think this would be fantastic. I've proposed unconditionally
> showing the earliest subject before and it seems that people who
> correspond mostly with those who have good threading etiquette would
> prefer this change, but those who correspond with more people who use
> 'reply' like an address book prefer the current behavior.
And then, especially, the following one would be very useful for me:
> Another option, which I'd like to experiment with but haven't found
> the time, is to show *all* distinct subjects for matched messages in a
> thread (modulo "Re:", etc) in the summary buffer, probably on multiple
> lines. Since most threads only have a single unique subject, they
> would appear just as they do now, but it would be clear when someone
> (or something, like git) changed the subject mid-thread. This
> approach would be far more robust while retaining good usability, but
> it would require more code than just changing our subject-picking
> heuristic.
I'm aware of notmuch Emacs UI 'notmuch-tree' and 'notmuch-unthreaded',
but these are not quite what is desired here: too verbose, compared to
the concise display variant of 'notmuch-search'.
Grüße
Thomas\r
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 16:03 Provide an option to make thread summaries keep initial subject Olivier Berger
2012-09-25 19:31 ` Austin Clements
2021-12-07 10:23 ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2021-12-07 13:41 ` David Bremner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y24wg1cq.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net \
--to=thomas@schwinge.name \
--cc=amdragon@MIT.EDU \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).