From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7693431FC0; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:50:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sXt9YNJlYgqH; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:50:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D313B431FAE; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:50:12 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Keith Amidon In-Reply-To: <87k4xasghb.fsf@friend.picnicpark.org> References: <1259328615-1445-1-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-2-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-3-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-4-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-5-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-6-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <87hbsftel8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87k4xasghb.fsf@friend.picnicpark.org> Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:49:58 -0800 Message-ID: <87ws1apmih.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Keith Amidon Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] Forward individual messages using message-forward X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:50:14 -0000 --=-=-= On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:32:00 -0800, Keith Amidon wrote: > What are your thoughts generally about integration with things like > message mode vs. implementing more into the C program? If you think the > message-mode enhancements will have a life I'll spend some time on this > and getting the semi-broken version of the reply functions I posted > working more correctly as well. My style has generally been to do whatever I think is easiest. And since I'm a user of the emacs interface to notmuch, that often means trying to use some of the very full-featured code within emacs first. But then again, as you've seen, just trying to figure out to use that code can be a challenge in and of itself. And meanwhile, the improvements to the C program will benefit the other backends. So when there are quick and easy things, (like calling an existing function on an 'f' binding like above), that totally makes sense to do. We can look at things like that as interim solutions until the C program grows up. Long-term, I do expect a lot of features to end up being implemented in the C program. -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLEWLG6JDdNq8qSWgRApxJAKCJVnFmEW41DiGYUB7i1pQi6S7+swCgqVUy mbwcOAmITkPKk3LyRpWu830= =4tI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--