unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Sander Boer <sanderboer@mauc.nl>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:24:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrg3pyra.fsf@SSpaeth.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wrg5905c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1174 bytes --]

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:22:23 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> First, it's important to understand that any friction here comes from
> Gmail exposing its tags as folders, (which in turn could be the lack of
> availability of a more tag-aware protocol than imap).

Even risking to become a bit thread-offtopic: IMAP itself supports tags
just fine and should be able to read/set/search all tags just fine (even
any user defined). My feeling is more that this is a lack of tag-using
IMAP clients to expose existing tag functionality. Thunderbird is doing
fine exposing up to 4 user-defined tags that are synced to the server,
but it's still not doing all it can.

I still believe that it would be possible to eg. sync all our notmuch
tags to the IMAP server, which would help enormously with syncing across
machines. I still have the long-term goal of offlineimap being able to sync
notmuch tags. (very long term, though)

As for Gmail and folders, I think it is an ugly kludge leading to all
kinds of awkward behavior (at least when treating Gmail as an IMAP
server). On the other hand it exposes nice tag behavior to clients that
wouldn't support it.

Sebastian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-30  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.5.1309146869.12973.notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
2011-06-27  7:43 ` notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57 Sander Boer
2011-06-28 20:22   ` Carl Worth
2011-06-28 21:43     ` Sander Boer
2011-06-28 22:38       ` Mark Anderson
2011-06-28 23:53         ` Carl Worth
2011-06-29 20:21           ` Mark Anderson
2011-06-29 20:54             ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2011-06-29 22:19               ` Mark Anderson
2011-06-30  7:15                 ` Pieter Praet
2011-06-28 22:42       ` Mark Anderson
2011-06-30  7:24     ` Sebastian Spaeth [this message]
2011-07-06 18:31       ` Sander Boer
2011-07-06 18:46         ` Daniel Schoepe
2011-07-11 13:22           ` Sebastian Spaeth
2011-07-11 13:33             ` Daniel Schoepe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wrg3pyra.fsf@SSpaeth.de \
    --to=sebastian@sspaeth.de \
    --cc=cworth@cworth.org \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    --cc=sanderboer@mauc.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).