From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E7429E25 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 04:55:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TiSU7sYO7ax8 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 04:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5A8429E21 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 04:55:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D162E50DA5; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 04:55:32 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (h-67-100-110-30.nycmny83.dynamic.covad.net [67.100.110.30]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8053F2E50CBC; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 04:55:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2AA264DF; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 04:55:27 -0800 (PST) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Tomi Ollila , Bart Bunting , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: nottoomuch-addresses.pl In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10~rc1+25~g719d650 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:55:24 -0500 Message-ID: <87wrabmb43.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:55:37 -0000 --=-=-= On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:35:03 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > Yes, the search is deliberately case sensitive. I haven't had a chance to play around with this but I will say that it makes more sense to me that this kind of search should deliberately be case *in*sensitive. Case sensitivity seems fairly detrimental here, actually, considering there is no consistency in case in names or email addresses. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO3L88AAoJEO00zqvie6q8bMoQAJEL5KIDGQ1jDbOffVmtGEL9 wUc3QjOAlJAXoN01Oj2q5aVQNyn0hJcyJot0Pf2eUDSJBw6fr2sJl1ftxyYc5VOy VaKYSriyeyW616Av5C/t+KX7YJcNUqqbQFEzBOqyculCda2wqRXj6rYGMEGHmf91 zZuHZ4nBSf/odEiVOB6Nkk6H3mooHOcW1n7d5t0iGXLzP645vsdV+SFrEVMGGCoj D6FJgU9hkTjXvbGnbgHpvSYjH5N05EJC5AAAu8gFJZ68k1jraT5H/SebgUKbvdn2 kCajBZ304yfXGGaa6SUpDqlBQUzekGsJRt/+sf+8u6Gu66J9M8V5ldyQAsQZ7MKQ sd2QZYumHp7gMFL4htJ4Bti0o6QErxfYK6qzla/NVyjr+10IaxzpCLDAYcIeLnn2 9dbw25xREkV745cme3MkD7KaaezRQ0OQ6pjQHzoeX7Vh0LSu8np2gGT+vBgQqrgb ULilIlv0UPiKsieJjZ4uG5LRFrnEFr6P9ZBZ0jFw1BJENBKVwO0Ebhg/z7HwOzpZ ZMPZkBR1YHjaDaeJi2qNEEfKvJvXW9QNFbSaQ5Fs5AIKNL2iIvTHxU+0k4DJ3Scy VGMFt5ElabX6fop4h6hnm7F0JbsxxuddXK6VnuaD/Y2cd9iMpfNraJLftL2pGaV9 dDepT5RaQBiputBoQcG9 =tbzF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--