From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872D8431FB6 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:24:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52NXYDfd5G5d for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BDB431FAE for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SBlZ1-0007Is-An; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:24:51 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SBlYw-0004lX-28; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:24:42 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cli: refactor "notmuch tag" data structures for tagging operations In-Reply-To: <992ada5cb2fa5f89d4f38b10d62f1c178b3174e2.1332604895.git.jani@nikula.org> References: <992ada5cb2fa5f89d4f38b10d62f1c178b3174e2.1332604895.git.jani@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:24:42 -0300 Message-ID: <87wr68zzwl.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:24:56 -0000 On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:14:35 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > To simplify code, keep all tagging operations in a single array > instead of separate add and remove arrays. Apply tag changes in the > order specified on the command line, instead of first removing and > then adding the tags. Like I said on IRC, my only minor reservation with this patch is that the use of C99 struct assignment is maybe not a good tradeoff here, since it makes the code a bit more mysterious (for the great unwashed masses that don't know C99 as well as C89). Still, if you think extra initialization features are worth it, I can live with it. d