From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FD4431FAE for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:18:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id puJTolz1bvIV for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D35A431FBD for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2D52E50BD5; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (rrcs-24-103-26-131.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.26.131]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506922E50DFC; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3BD054AD; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Austin Clements Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] cli: modify mime_node_context to use the new notmuch_crypto_t In-Reply-To: <20120518190925.GU11804@mit.edu> References: <1337362357-31281-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1337362357-31281-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1337362357-31281-3-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1337362357-31281-4-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <20120518190925.GU11804@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+183~g9d5ff3c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:49 -0700 Message-ID: <87wr499u3m.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:18:02 -0000 --=-=-= On Fri, May 18 2012, Austin Clements wrote: >> - (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err); >> + (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->crypto.gpgctx, &err); > > This should be crypto->gpgctx. Weird. Good catch, Austin! But I must admit I'm thoroughly confused. I tested every stage of this series right before I sent, and sure enough this patch compiles cleanly and all tests pass. Can anyone explain why? I don't understand. I'll send a new version of this one patch now anyway. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPtqBdAAoJEO00zqvie6q8O/MP/ihaPSKfWHytzM6N/1QrXICr ktem0YFo4uISK9dj8sGhKZiqOEoOEkn09Q5Lz1vpznMOcaj4SrcrfjKfKHGqriuf Ogp5Ll6WauI0UWlvMTkxyh3mLQq78vxzf6F2ivkR8C+hBgT88MPLoDl+CGA2Nt4S whJLGPf9Zq5HmtxPlqbBcMsSMzQn6C7bb1iFE/tTOj2ORpkWkX5SsCmIuF+GdcSZ RLu3Rr0UCaFbK8hhLK0pRRLB0EtiMx8EBEPLofDnvYyOe+JGEjsXIpTeNXRGT/7i pzsWJpUpu3wj+pNQjWmijIEuuwDq4iY0h0Dvxswl9OlZhAKdNcf9GOtSjmjseOB6 CzIHXKgkUHzM9SIAGSzmQIiUGYGNKogA/6+u9H7zVdYn6MTt/yHKpJ1jNVWT2B/E 0oh3D6FmVOGEto09L9kiJGZ+eJLaeMQ9yJFKLPPu/Rv9hcItdeuQ1MteUnFpqpXh qCljLK1Kb+Cr7Am+kGOTYjZw5M1XhsFz8l4CVN3CtLnWs0SFApE7YuO89mhuLmMc ULuhN/apP27CYmJkioaTZkSw+oFtwhROM3YkpJXEidId0T9lcm2wl2EXldT6qR9P xkf970yd27NXh/WuYIh1CJ3WinlGxqYl6Apihj+Vo/V8kG1va0QsWCRQK/i7T3XM 2y3gVOlx8p9AvEoXc8Oh =RBIl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--