On Fri, May 18 2012, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
>> -		(GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);
>> +		(GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->crypto.gpgctx, &err);
>
> This should be crypto->gpgctx.

Weird.  Good catch, Austin!  But I must admit I'm thoroughly confused.
I tested every stage of this series right before I sent, and sure enough
this patch compiles cleanly and all tests pass.  Can anyone explain why?
I don't understand.  I'll send a new version of this one patch now
anyway.

jamie.