From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2546DE0946 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 03:17:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.236 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.216, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wzVoX3O53dtZ for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 03:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-f43.google.com (mail-lf0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE7986DE02AC for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 03:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b75so162158749lfg.3 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 03:17:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nikula-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=L5+bEwUP3jp//FdWR1P7YDxOMS0HOFHScSnuOLLUvfw=; b=IqN7EiiEqkz8oxRtxD2xPj8E1EjkGDsFWBr0fYqOSFKLdZTU3ejMESyjkwcppNkJT5 Q//nq/vpSR+I0PZ9S3HsNiAZ5WaOOGLznMIGyri1asNYpGwCA9mNiCQo42CcaRAan724 klBWJDSc2FlofJfuOoeDmPDo4xGAjUpe53cO1s24qL2HwiXGs7RzJ9cLxvrJpHQcgW+t rFzq3m6dTHbUPE0U9i+1IeaT4Gut8KG6SpkPOMlHtrLNKeZGARdYhdEC+S1iVLR1yz0H y1GXqyAgO85jWTJ3i/3KNM3VySpqmmA2ftoXH8BnvGukT+RWQjKCRwn3HtwwNIVu1d6D 6ksQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=L5+bEwUP3jp//FdWR1P7YDxOMS0HOFHScSnuOLLUvfw=; b=kIFuog3zc6iPIgDFAo9zRcIQObOVNrJwyjuS94qSh5S+X63fRtKxVwlVfWsRPO+nH2 bmzpXT6MbeDUbbR+NwnrpdjYPIcivBfNmlI/ij6cZLEK0/iy+Jbzrc1gsG9k95RQcYcs rXqFrpl4JRoX02WRXoCDUak1Gs0Ndy8OjiXoF5LoMlLaYBBZX+ot/GkroSDIHiG2/Qp9 EvSHATcOZSEINbmCgW6Qr76o5gYVQ5cMMbUUWOhqMOUVPxW4z3cclnH00o5wO1/6Gzva 2UTQA/uqvPBeDuIQ5X+XQZ7HsFxr758JXYakrDroBbrzugeJELP5IJmFxQkKL1qf2n3z G+Gw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfNepevW5loiWUUReoTq9Ztpm+husBqgYUZhQSV5mzIXrxOhxENxwOSzzSBQMGpnQ== X-Received: by 10.25.31.199 with SMTP id f190mr2128431lff.49.1477131453766; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 03:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (mobile-access-bceef0-89.dhcp.inet.fi. [188.238.240.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u193sm1178071lja.27.2016.10.22.03.17.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 03:17:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Jani Nikula To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: bash completion install location In-Reply-To: <87d1jggylv.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87d1jggylv.fsf@zancas.localnet> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:15:43 +0300 Message-ID: <87wph0y9io.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 10:17:38 -0000 On Tue, 04 Oct 2016, David Bremner wrote: > Debian complains about /etc/bash_completion.d begin obsolete and also > claims that /usr/share/bash-completion/completions is the right location > [1]. Can someone who uses bash (ideally also some non-Debian platform) > please confirm or deny this? I don't know about one or the other location being "obsolete" or "right", but as a data point, both 'dpkg -S /etc/bash_completion.d' and 'dpkg -S /usr/share/bash-completion/completions' list plenty of packages on Debian Jessie. Looking at upstream, the former seems to be used, perhaps the latter is a Debian thing. Not very helpful, is it? :/ BR, Jani.