From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF5B6DE1344 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:12:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.137 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.683, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fgjRFrEsyKNf for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:12:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D53F66DE1343 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD60206CA; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:12:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:12:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=fIbb6Rz+rt07iyTOM6kgR1g3CFk=; b=l3JLXa d4sMebVdKDGbPjHfb0uuPdaSE8L5pO4GcZDcvE3WWrhn7v7pUOHX1ZNLNEqpV/bo YnB/3L8W63P1Hwo5hhyudOCUegK08KPkF7Xn0gvzZ11U9o0B4YtTZVk3zBeCiFpP aRd4NO6f2NqStKBFWEnUZ9c6ZkSGSUf5X68mU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=fIbb6Rz+rt07iy TOM6kgR1g3CFk=; b=IaBFvIyUCLgSua2i7IRmNkPFh0G6DxgqEDIoASUNn6oIuQ hwqMff8lFJ3sdxX98uGs/h6nJGnKepmJg6Cr8KzRH9ajZbp30jVKmxX+PITVOJPM hofb55IQORlV7YGYVke3Fl5BLKC4Yhx0u3QtcyLTCVQiwuTnzlt7D6C8wRN2I= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: A4J9qYbRw6qTZzCgDSG6Zl4gC1nUksHdB5jhqWJFBBSf 1479845534 Received: from localhost (128.92-221-147.customer.lyse.net [92.221.147.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 973157E2E0; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:12:14 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: T350 test failures with gnupg-2.1.16 In-Reply-To: <87h96zl1zr.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> References: <87shqj5nha.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87h96zl1zr.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.23.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:12:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87wpfvnujm.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:12:17 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain David Bremner writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Hello! >> >> After updating to gnupg 2.1.16, T350-crypto.sh fails in some of the >> signature verification steps with wrong content-length: >> >> T350-crypto: Testing PGP/MIME signature verification and decryption >> PASS emacs delivery of signed message >> FAIL signature verification >> --- T350-crypto.2.expected 2016-11-22 18:59:48.341851653 +0000 >> +++ T350-crypto.2.output 2016-11-22 18:59:48.341851653 +0000 >> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ >> "id": 2 >> }, >> { >> - "content-length": 280, >> + "content-length": 312, >> "content-type": "application/pgp-signature", > > These failures are not duplicated for me in debian sid, also with gpg > 2.1.16. From IRC I believe Marius is running GuixSD. This is correct. Strange that it's not reproducible on Debian. Any tips for how to troubleshoot this further? Is the content-length based on signature only? I'll see if I can extract the raw output somehow. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlg0pp0ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrN1wgAosKeb0vDJfbBua2rxbfV+BaFB13LnJFLoI1jFLsdBqS2tWswNkJwokny sNwl7wp7TYq6hNQR6c8ymOColMlAs3GoHYI4w7N0Gg9mKLo6Aelthp62RSja6txp H2TklAY68zGcxginSb55T9X86s+Rw2y/lxhoIcJEGCF5CAVDyTiFtm8KkHDROsma 7n/cq/HlhXtg+T/2Y0X0lWPaM1tOqArVO0Aj1ZQxa/hz9MgKFW3qC333KN4LRRoI n86tNzzh7e/HbWWFrH0QKEFHuY6kZqpGyK5pZvmBkLKNNfeFIHYqD1/wLQgiPUi9 OfLlOHLzRTrY90ZFWmV7XA+AJd2FXA== =vHEB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--