unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
	Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cli: add support for only printing the addresses in notmuch address
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:16:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wp1hg98f.fsf@ligo.caltech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873745vq52.fsf@nikula.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 800 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 20 2017, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
> ~$ notmuch address --output=sender --output=recipients --output=address --output=count id:878tdy8a2q.fsf@ligo.caltech.edu
> 1	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> 1	jrollins@finestructure.net
> 1	dkg@fifthhorseman.net
> 1	jani@nikula.org
>
> I prefer this to separate options.

Really?  If each is just a switch then why not:

~$ notmuch address --sender --recipients --address --count id:878tdy8a2q.fsf@ligo.caltech.edu

?  It's just shorter, right?

Also, this behavior is quite different than for search, in which only
the last --output applies.

> notmuch search uses separate --entire-thread, --body, and --include-html
> options, and I think those are getting messy.

The seem less messy than a "--output=" prefixed version of the same.

jamie.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-20  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-02 18:44 [PATCH] cli: add support for only printing the addresses in notmuch address Jani Nikula
2017-12-15 12:01 ` David Bremner
2017-12-19 21:23 ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2017-12-20  1:12   ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-12-20  1:25     ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2017-12-20  7:02       ` Jani Nikula
2017-12-20  7:16         ` Jameson Graef Rollins [this message]
2017-12-20 11:15           ` Jani Nikula
2017-12-20 16:41             ` Jameson Graef Rollins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wp1hg98f.fsf@ligo.caltech.edu \
    --to=jrollins@finestructure.net \
    --cc=dkg@fifthhorseman.net \
    --cc=jani@nikula.org \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).